[COMMITTED] Move range allocator code to value-range-storage.*

Now that vrange_storage is in its own file, I think it's prudent to move all the vrange allocator code there since it's all related. The users of value-range.h do not need to know the implementation details of the storage facilities. Tested and benchmarked on x86-64 Linux. gcc/ChangeLog:

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Use fixed-width types in allocation size tests

On Sat, 2022-07-02 at 19:38 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 01:20 +0200, Tim Lange wrote: > > Hi, > > > > thanks for the mail! Embarrassingly, I did not account for the > > different > > sizes types may have on different systems. I've switched all > > testcases > > to the fixed

Re: [RFC] fortran: restore array indexing for all descriptor arrays [PR102043]

On 2 July 2022 14:47:01 CEST, Mikael Morin wrote: >Le 02/07/2022 à 13:18, Thomas Koenig a écrit : >> >> One thought: If we have to bite the bullet and break the ABI, why not go >> all the way and use the C descriptors in ISO_Fortran_binding.h as >> gfortran's native format? >> >As far as I know,

RE: [PATCH] i386: Extend cvtps2pd to memory

Hi all, I revised my patch according to all your reviews. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. BRs, Haochen > -Original Message- > From: Liu, Hongtao > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:57 PM > To: Uros Bizjak ; Jiang, Haochen > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] i386: Ex

[COMMITTED] Remove some deprecated irange methods.

Tested on x86-64 Linux. gcc/ChangeLog: * ipa-cp.cc (ipcp_vr_lattice::meet_with_1): Use operator!=. * ipa-prop.cc (struct ipa_vr_ggc_hash_traits): Same. * tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.cc (struct unswitch_predicate): Use set with two arguments. (find_unswitching_pr

Re: [PATCH] tree-sra: Fix union handling in build_reconstructed_reference (PR 105860)

On Fri, 1 Jul 2022, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > As the testcase in PR 105860 shows, the code that tries to re-use the > handled_component chains in SRA can be horribly confused by unions, > where it thinks it has found a compatible structure under which it can > chain the references, but in fa

Re: [PATCH] i386: Extend cvtps2pd to memory

On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jiang, Haochen wrote: > > Hi all, > > I revised my patch according to all your reviews. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK. Thanks, Uros. > > BRs, > Haochen > > > -Original Message- > > From: Liu, Hongtao > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:57 PM >

Re: [PATCH] loongarch: use -mno-check-zero-division as the default for optimized code

在 2022/7/3 上午11:06, Xi Ruoyao 写道: On Sat, 2022-07-02 at 16:35 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote: 在 2022/7/2 下午4:24, Xi Ruoyao 写道: I'll commit the patch with the hook removed after another regtest on loongarch64-linux-gnu.  I just rebuilt the entire system on my 3A5000, so I need some time to set it up.

[PATCH v3, rs6000] Disable TImode from Bool expanders [PR100694, PR93123]

Hi, This patch fails TImode for all 128-bit logical operation expanders. So TImode splits to two DI registers during expand. Potential optimizations can be taken after expand pass. Originally, the TImode logical operations are split after reload pass. It's too late. The test case illustrates it.

Ping [PATCH v6, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605]

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/597158.html Thanks. On 24/6/2022 上午 10:02, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: > Hi, > This patch implements optab f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp on rs6000. > Tests show that outputs of xs[min/max]dp are consistent with the standard

Re: [PATCH v2, rs6000] Use CC for BCD operations [PR100736]

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/597020.html Thanks. On 22/6/2022 下午 4:26, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: > Hi, > This patch uses CC instead of CCFP for all BCD operations. Thus, infinite > math flag has no impact on BCD operations. To support BCD overflow and >

Re: [GCC 13][PATCH] PR101836: Add a new option -fstrict-flex-array[=n] and use it in __builtin_object_size

On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 5:32 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 7/1/22 08:01, Qing Zhao wrote: > > > > > >> On Jul 1, 2022, at 8:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 12:55:08PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: > >>> If so, comparing to the current implemenation to have all the checking

Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Fix pure/const function attributes for intrinsics

On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 5:59 PM Andrew Carlotti wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 08:42:15AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:04 PM Andrew Carlotti via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.cc > > > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-bu

Re: [PATCH] loongarch: use -mno-check-zero-division as the default for optimized code

On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 14:25 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote: > > How do you think about the suggestion from Richard about a backport into > > gcc-12 branch?  Normally we don't backport behavior changes, but making > > 12.1 the only exception seems compelling. > > I agree with you and Richard. > > Thanks

[PATCH] HIGH part of symbol ref is invalid for constant pool

The high part of the symbol address is invalid for the constant pool. In function rs6000_cannot_force_const_mem, we already return true for "HIGH with UNSPEC" rtx. During debug GCC, I found that rs6000_cannot_force_const_mem is called for some other HIGH code rtx expressions which also indicate the