On Sat, 2022-07-02 at 19:38 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 01:20 +0200, Tim Lange wrote: > > Hi, > > > > thanks for the mail! Embarrassingly, I did not account for the > > different > > sizes types may have on different systems. I've switched all > > testcases > > to the fixed-width types of stdint.h. > > > > Does this patch need an approval? > > Arguably falls under the "obvious" rule. > > That said, the patch looks good to me, though given that the sizes > are > now fixed the \\d+ regexps could be made more precise, if you like; I > think it's good either way.
...and in case I didn't say earlier, Tim: congratulations on getting your first patch into gcc. Dave
