Segher Boessenkool writes:
Thanks all!
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 03:13:13PM +0800, guojiufu wrote:
>> For very small loops (< 6 insns), it would be fine to unroll 4
>> times to use cache line better. Like below loops:
>> `while (i) a[--i] = NULL; while (p < e) *d++ = *p++;`
>
> Yes,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:59 AM CHIGOT, CLEMENT wrote:
>
> Description:
> On AIX, the compiler is able to handle DWARF-5 but not the linker.
>
> Changelog:
> 2020-07-07 Clement Chigot
> * configure.ac: Extend check to the linker for DWARF-5 support
> * configure: Regenerate
>
> Please apply fo
On 7/7/20 3:36 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/7/20 9:33 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
We are ICEing in the testcase below because we pass the
yet-uninstantiated class type A of the PARM_DECL b to
is_really_empty_class from potential_rvalue_constant_expression
On 7/7/20 6:40 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ "% type specifier is a C++14 extension");
The usual phrasing is "...only available with %<-std=c++14%> or
%<-std=gnu++14%>". OK with that change.
Jason
Hi Richard,
on 2020/7/7 下午6:44, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>> on 2020/7/2 下午1:20, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> on 2020/7/1 下午11:17, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> on 2020/7/1 上午3:53, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>>>
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo