On 7/7/20 3:36 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, Jason Merrill wrote:

On 7/7/20 9:33 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
We are ICEing in the testcase below because we pass the
yet-uninstantiated class type A<int> of the PARM_DECL b to
is_really_empty_class from potential_rvalue_constant_expression when
parsing the requirement t += b.

Why are we getting to potential_rvalue_constant_expression?  My guess is from
build_non_dependent_expr because processing_constraint isn't set?

My mistake, I meant to write that we are calling is_really_empty_class
from is_rvalue_constant_expression, not from
potential_rvalue_constant_expression.  And we're getting to
is_rvalue_constant_expression from cp_parser_constant_expression when
parsing the RHS of the assignment.

Most of the parser constant-expression stuff is a relic of C++98; I tried changing cp_parser_constant_expression to only check constancy when we're requiring a constant expression, but that broke some library tests for some reason.

This patch fixes the ICE by guarding the problematic call to
is_really_empty_class with a COMPLETE_TYPE_P check, which should also
subsume the existing dependent_type_p check.

OK.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK to
commit to trunk and to the 10 branch?

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/95497
        * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): When
        processing_template_decl, check COMPLETE_TYPE_P before calling
        is_really_empty_class.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/95497
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr95497.C: New test.
---
   gcc/cp/constexpr.c                            |  2 +-
   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr95497.C | 12 ++++++++++++
   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr95497.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index 1939166e907..ff78ebda2dc 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -7443,7 +7443,7 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t, bool
want_rval, bool strict, bool now,
         if (now && want_rval)
        {
          tree type = TREE_TYPE (t);
-         if (dependent_type_p (type)
+         if ((processing_template_decl && !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
              || is_really_empty_class (type, /*ignore_vptr*/false))
            /* An empty class has no data to read.  */
            return true;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr95497.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr95497.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4d7718ad5e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr95497.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/95497
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template <typename T>
+struct A{};
+
+template <typename T>
+concept c =
+    requires(T t, A<int> b) // note that A<int> is independent of T
+    {
+        { t += b };
+    };





Reply via email to