Re: Patch ping

2016-09-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:28:14PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 09/28/2016 09:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >I'd like to ping the > > > >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01436.html > > > >patch, containing various fixes for gimple-ssa-sprintf.c. > >If the 0 < var to var > 0 changes

Re: Patch ping

2016-09-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:28:14PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 09/28/2016 09:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >I'd like to ping the > > > >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01436.html > > > >patch, containing various fixes for gimple-ssa-sprintf.c. > >If the 0 < var to var > 0 changes

Re: [PATCH] fix profiledbootstrap with -Werror=format-length (77753)

2016-09-28 Thread Martin Sebor
On 09/27/2016 10:38 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 09/27/2016 01:30 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: The attached one line patch increases a local buffer size to avoid an apparently justified (though in reality likely a false positive) -Wformat-length warning in varasm.c. The warning has been reported to break

Re: Change license of filenames.h to LGPL

2016-09-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Alexandre Oliva > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:03:02 -0300 > > Does that work for everyone involved? Except that no one will reimburse me for the time I wasted talking to several people, with eventually null result...

Re: Patch ping

2016-09-28 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi, I too personally always prefer to write the code as the variable at the left side and the constant at the right side of the comparison, because that is how I would also say it naturally in an English or German sentence. Like for instance "my son is more than 7 years old". I think nobody woul

Re: Change license of filenames.h to LGPL

2016-09-28 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 9/28/16, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Alexandre Oliva >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:03:02 -0300 >> >> Does that work for everyone involved? > > Except that no one will reimburse me for the time I wasted talking to > several people, with eventually null result...

Re: Patch ping

2016-09-28 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 09/28/2016 09:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: And here are the 0 < var to var > 0 changes. Thoughts on those? I kind of meant it the other way round, so yeah, please install. Bernd

[PATCH, i386]: Fix PR 77756, _-get_cpuid() returns wrong values for level 7 (extended features)

2016-09-28 Thread Uros Bizjak
2016-09-28 Uros Bizjak PR target/77756 * config/i386/cpuid.h (__get_cpuid): Handle CPUID level >= 7. testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-09-28 Uros Bizjak PR target/77756 * gcc.target/i386/pr77756.c: New test. Patch was bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}

Re: Patch ping

2016-09-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:17:55PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 09/28/2016 09:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >And here are the 0 < var to var > 0 changes. Thoughts on those? > > I kind of meant it the other way round, so yeah, please install. Oops, sorry, shall I revert what I've committed th

Re: Patch ping

2016-09-28 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 09/28/2016 11:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:17:55PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: On 09/28/2016 09:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: And here are the 0 < var to var > 0 changes. Thoughts on those? I kind of meant it the other way round, so yeah, please install. Oops, so

Re: Patch ping

2016-09-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:46:59PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 09/28/2016 11:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:17:55PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > >>On 09/28/2016 09:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >>>And here are the 0 < var to var > 0 changes. Thoughts on those? > >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2][RS6000] .gnu.attribute Tag_GNU_Power_ABI_FP

2016-09-28 Thread Alan Modra
Committed as svn r240601 and patch 2/2 as r240602. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: Implement -Wimplicit-fallthrough (version 9)

2016-09-28 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek writes: >> default: >> { >> complaint (&symfile_complaints, >> _("Storage class %d not recognized during scan"), >> sclass); >> } >> /* FALLTHROUGH */ >> >> /* C_FCN is .bf and .ef symbols. I think it is sufficient >> to handle only the C_FUN and C_EXT. */ >> cas

libgo patch committed: Copy runtime.go and runtime1.go from Go 1.7 to libgo

2016-09-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
This patch copies runtime.go and runtime1.go from the Go 1.7 runtime library to libgo, replacing some miscellaneous functions currently written in C. Some transitional support routines are added to stubs.go. A few other minor files come along for the ride. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86

Re: Change license of filenames.h to LGPL

2016-09-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Ozkan Sezer > Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:09:19 +0300 > Cc: Alexandre Oliva , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > On 9/28/16, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Alexandre Oliva > >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > >> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:03:02 -0300 > >> > >> Does that work for everyone involved?

Re: [PATCH][1/2] Fix PR77768

2016-09-28 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.09.28 at 13:33 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > I am testing the following patch to avoid useless VRP range allocations > when we just ask for varying on stmts we don't know how to handle. > I think it should fix the PR where we end up assigning to the > static const vr_const_varying retur

[patch][fix PR other/31566] @missing_file gives bad error message

2016-09-28 Thread Prasad Ghangal
Hi all, I don't know if this is the right time to submit such patches. But this patch attempts to fix https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566 I have successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu testcases: file: -Wall test.c: void foo() { int a,b; a = b + 1; } @t

<    1   2