On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:46:59PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 09/28/2016 11:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:17:55PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >>On 09/28/2016 09:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>>And here are the 0 < var to var > 0 changes. Thoughts on those?
> >>
> >>I kind of meant it the other way round, so yeah, please install.
> >
> >Oops, sorry, shall I revert what I've committed then?
>
> No, I think it looks fine too, although I can't figure out why that one
> block of code was moved.
The intent was that each of the non-__*_chk builtins is followed by its
__*_chk counterpart; without the patch that was almost the case except for
that one exception.
Jakub
