Frankly at this stage, I do not think it makes sense to maintain an Ada port
for DJGPP and in particular maintain all these extra special cases and #ifdefs.
How many users are we talking about here?
Arno
> This is first of 4 patches for DJGPP support of Ada compiler
>
> Patch adds support of ha
On 07/29/16 15:03, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 07/29/16 09:02, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 08:59:44PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> (insn 1047 1044 1048 101 (set (reg/f:DI 481)
>>> (subreg:DI (reg/f:SI 545) 0)) isl_input.c:2496 50
>>> {*movdi_aarch64}
>>>
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> TImode register referenced in debug insn can be converted to V1TImode by
> scalar to vector optimization. When converting a TImode store to V1TImode,
> we need to check all debug insns on its use chain to convert the V1TImode
> register to SUBREG
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 08:17:59AM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ok, I the incorrect REG_POINTER is done here:
>
> cse_main -> reg_scan -> reg_scan_mark_refs -> set_reg_attrs_from_value
>
> and here I see a bug, because if POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED
> can_be_reg_pointer is only set to false if x i
This patch adds better support for optimizing vec_extract of vector double or
vector long on 64-bit machines with direct move when the vector is in memory.
It converts the memory address from a vector address to the address of the
element, paying attention to the address mode allowed by the registe
I noticed I forgot to include one of the changes in the ChangeLog file
(rtx_is_swappable_p). This change was originally meant to be in the previous
patch, and it got left out. The corrected ChangeLog is:
[gcc]
2016-07-30 Michael Meissner
* config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h (rs6000_adjust
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This patch adds better support for optimizing vec_extract of vector double or
> vector long on 64-bit machines with direct move when the vector is in memory.
> I have tested this on a big endian power7 system (both 32-bit and 64-b
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 11:37:46AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> I noticed I forgot to include one of the changes in the ChangeLog file
> (rtx_is_swappable_p). This change was originally meant to be in the previous
> patch, and it got left out. The corrected ChangeLog is:
But put it on the co
I've committed the following patch.
2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/68566
* check.c (gfc_check_reshape): Check for constant expression.
2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/68566
* gfortran.dg/pr68566.f90: new test.
Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
==
The attached patch has been built and tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
There are no regression in the testing. OK to commit?
2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/41922
* target-memory.c (expr_to_char): Pass in locus and use it in error
messages.
(gfc_merge_initializ
> Frankly at this stage, I do not think it makes sense to maintain an
> Ada port for DJGPP and in particular maintain all these extra
> special cases and #ifdefs.
I don't think this is a reasonable attitude to take with people who
are willing to do the work to do it. Frankly, I'd like to take Ad
11 matches
Mail list logo
