On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 04:26:12PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > *** get_unary_op (tree name, enum tree_code
> > *** 621,626
> > --- 641,680
> > return NULL_TREE;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Return true if OP1 and OP2 have the sa
Ping.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:31:22PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> The following is another issue with macros from system headers. In this case
> bool is defined in a system header to expand to _Bool and the "is promoted to"
> warning didn't trigger because of that. The fix is to use the exp
This patch cures a problem with ICF of read-only variables at the
intersection of -fsection-anchors, -ftree-loop-vectorize, and targets
with alignment restrictions. The testcase results in
/usr/local/powerpc64le-linux/bin/ld: pack.o: In function `main':
pack.c:(.text.startup+0xc): error: R_PPC64_T
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The gcc.dg/lto/pr54709, pr61526, pr64415 linking testcases keep failing on
> arm/aarch64 bare-metal target.
>
> It's because statically built newlib library is used to link with shared
> object.
> And the linker complains about reloca
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias
> > issues with alias analysis. This time it's points-to and the DECL_UIDs
> > used in points-to sets not bein
On 02/29/2016 03:58 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>
>> S/390: Use enabled attribute overrides to disable alternatives.
>> S/390: Get rid of Y constraint in rotate patterns.
>> S/390: Get rid of Y constraint in left and logical right shift
>> patterns.
>> S/390: Get
On 02/29/2016 02:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 09:46 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> Ok for mainline?
>>
>> * gensupport.c (process_substs_on_one_elem): Split loop to
>> complete mark_operands_used_in_match_dup on all expressions in the
>> vector first.
>> (adjust_op
This patch improves sanitizer testsuite to avoid sporadic failures, especially
when [cross-]testing on a remote machine.
There are several unstable sanitizer tests in GCC testsuite (e.g.,
g++.dg/tsan/aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C), and the instability comes from the
test doing this:
printf("Pas
Hi,
this patch fixes graphite PR68659, which is a 6 regression.
The patch fixes two things:
- by handling new_expr == NULL_TREE in collect_all_ssa_names, it handles a
COMPONENT_REF where operand 2 is NULL_TREE.
- it handles an ADDR_EXPR in get_new_name.
Together, they allow the currently faili
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixes graphite PR68659, which is a 6 regression.
>
> The patch fixes two things:
> - by handling new_expr == NULL_TREE in collect_all_ssa_names, it handles a
> COMPONENT_REF where operand 2 is NULL_TREE.
> - it handles an ADDR_EXPR i
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias
> > > issues with alias analysis. Th
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last
On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The fo
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >>>
> On Fri, Feb 26,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently multi-step vector conversion tries to compute
> intermediate type from its mode but it doesn't work for
> boolean vectors. This patch introduces a computation
> of intermediate vector masks. Bootstrapped and tested
> on x
As suggested by Jakub this adds the missing combination.
Bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2016-03-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/69994
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (ops_equal_values_p): Handle missing case.
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
=
The attached patch enables Stack_Check_Probes for Ada on S/390[x]
and thereby fixes the acats test cases c52103x, c52104x and
cb1010a.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on s390x (-m31, -m64) and s390.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany
gcc/ada/ChangeLog
* system-linux
Hi David,
On 02/10/2016 10:52 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> There are two remaining issues:
>>
>> 1) FDEs with overlapping ranges causing problems with exceptions. I'm
>> not sure of the best way to work around this. Your patch is one
>> possible solution.
>
> This patch is not meant as
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 02:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > On 02/29/2016 09:46 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> >> Ok for mainline?
> >>
> >>* gensupport.c (process_substs_on_one_elem): Split loop to
> >>complete mark_operands_used_in_mat
On 03/01/2016 01:15 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 02/29/2016 02:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Didn't I approve this a while ago? Not sure it's appropriate for stage4
though; is this series fixing an important regression?
Yes you
On 03/01/2016 01:15 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> On 02/29/2016 02:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 02/29/2016 09:46 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
Ok for mainline?
* gensupport.c (process_substs_on_one_elem): Split
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Michael Haubenwallner
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 02/10/2016 10:52 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
>>> There are two remaining issues:
>>>
>>> 1) FDEs with overlapping ranges causing problems with exceptions. I'm
>>> not sure of the best way to work around this.
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
> This patch improves sanitizer testsuite to avoid sporadic failures,
> especially when [cross-]testing on a remote machine.
>
> There are several unstable sanitizer tests in GCC testsuite (e.g.,
> g++.dg/tsan/aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C),
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2016-03-01 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/70022
* fold-const.c (fold_indirect_ref_1): Fix range checking for
vector BIT_FIELD_REF extract.
* gcc.dg/pr70022.c: New testcase.
Index: gcc/fold-
I am testing the following patch to fix PR69983 - SCEV was confused
by a PRE inserted PHI node where it checks for equality of the
evolution of all edges. After my SCEV fix these have conversions
which are not handled by eq_evolutions_p.
I've noticed the function misses any type compatibility ch
A trivial patch to fix an ICE on invalid: DECL_BUILT_IN only expects
a FUNCTION_DECL, so checking DECL_P is not enough.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2016-03-01 Marek Polacek
PR c++/69795
* c-common.c (reject_gcc_builtin): Check for FUNCTION_DECL rather
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 01:15 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> >> On 02/29/2016 02:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >>> On 02/29/2016 09:46 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Ok fo
This PR from 2011 reports that -Waddress prints unhelpful warning when the
comparison comes from a macro. Since I've added from_macro_expansion_at,
this is easy to circumvent. I'm not so sure we actually want to disable
the warning in the case of a macro, but probably yes.
Bootstrapped/regtested
OK.
Jason
When switching from gdb 7.10 to the newly released gdb 7.11 on Solaris,
all simulate-thread tests started to timeout, adding about 2 1/2 hours
to bootstrap time. It turned out that this happens as follows: with gdb
7.10, a test is run like this and runs to completion without interaction:
/vol/gcc
Hi all,
This test was reported as starting to fail a scan-assembler check with
-mtune=thunderx.
The compiler decided to move the result back into the integer registers and
perform the shift there
rather than do it on the SIMD side.
However, the C code is undefined because the shift is wider tha
On 03/01/2016 02:38 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> On 03/01/2016 01:15 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 02/29/2016 02:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/29
I wrote:
> Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>
> > +; vec_set is supposed to *modify* an existing vector so operand 0 is
> > +; duplicated as input operand.
> > +(define_expand "vec_set"
> > + [(set (match_operand:V0 "register_operand"
> >"")
> > + (unspec:V [(match_oper
On 03/01/2016 04:11 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>>
>>> +; vec_set is supposed to *modify* an existing vector so operand 0 is
>>> +; duplicated as input operand.
>>> +(define_expand "vec_set"
>>> + [(set (match_operand:V0 "register_operand"
On 29-02-16 10:17, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Another long-standing regression present in the compiler (dating back to the
Tree-SSA merge): the compiler generates code that has an unexpectedly large
stack usage for nested calls on strings, because the gimplifier creates
temporaries in the outermost sco
On 1 March 2016 at 16:19, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 20
On 03/01/2016 06:38 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
A trivial patch to fix an ICE on invalid: DECL_BUILT_IN only expects
a FUNCTION_DECL, so checking DECL_P is not enough.
You're right, that was caused by my r227458. I vaguely remember
wondering about that when I saw the stack trace but I must have
g
Hi Richard,
On 01/03/16 09:16, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
The gcc.dg/lto/pr54709, pr61526, pr64415 linking testcases keep failing on
arm/aarch64 bare-metal target.
It's because statically built newlib library is used to link with shared
ob
Hi all,
For GCC 6 we want to deprecate architecture revisions prior to ARMv4T.
This patch implements this by documenting the deprecation in invoke.texi and
adding
a warning whenever the user specifies an -march or -mcpu option that selects
such
an architecture revision.
Bootstrapped and tested
On 01/03/16 10:49, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James G
Two additional regression tests for problems exposed by the 69740
patches. They tickle a different path than the test HJ already checked
in. Obviously the idea is to have these in place so that when we attack
69740 again, we don't regress these issues.
Installed on the trunk after verifying
On 02/24/2016 09:31 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
The following is another issue with macros from system headers. In this case
bool is defined in a system header to expand to _Bool and the "is promoted to"
warning didn't trigger because of that. The fix is to use the expanded
location.
Bootstrappe
The following fixes a checking issue when verifying BIT_FIELD_REF
sizes of non-integral non-BLKmode types. We should be using
MODE_SIZE, not MODE_PRECISION here as seen with the testcase.
Bootstrap / regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
typedef long double a __attribute__((vector_size (
Hi Richard,
As discussed in PR, tried to adjust the test case by initializing array, but
looks like for building with -fpic it needs visibility to be set a hidden.
The below patch does that.
Ok for trunk ?
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 82e538e..f6bcb07 10
Hi Guys,
I am applying the patch below as an obvious fix for a problem with the
CR16 target - the lack of a definition of __INTPTR_TYPE__. This
definition is needed by the newlib C library's _intsup.h header in
order to correctly calculate the size of integers and pointers.
Cheers
Nick
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:48:40PM +, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-Ofast -fdump-tree-ifcvt-details -fno-common
> -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-Ofast -fdump-tree-ifcvt-details
> -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores" } */
>
>
On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last
Hi Marek,
Thank you for pointing out. Yes I should add.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 82e538e..f6bcb07 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2016-03-01 Venkataramanan Kumar
+
+ PR tree-optimization/686
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 02/22/2016 02:22 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>
My only question is why didn't you use FOR_EACH_SUBRTX_VRA from
rtl-iter.h
to walk the RTX expressions in collect_address_parts and
>>
Hi DJ,
Currently the MEP target does not define __INTPTR_TYPE__ or
__INT32_TYPE__ which is a problem for newlib. (The newlib header file
_intsup.h depends upon these macros being defined). Fortunately the
fix is easy - add newlib-stdin.h to the tm_file list for MEP.
So, is this patch
Hi,
this patch fixes an ICE in an openacc testcase. The patch fixes it by emitting
an 'unsupported' error.
We've been carrying this patch for a while in the gomp-4_0-branch (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01545.html ).
Build for C-only on top of trunk, ran goacc.exp regressi
This patches addresses PR 70014, where the predicates and operand do not
match and could cause problems with the register allocator. Tested
successfully on
arm-none-linux-gnueabi
arm-none-linux-gnuabihf
armeb-none-linux-gnuabihf
arm-none-eabi
Okay for trunk?
2016-03-01 Michael Collison
> This new test fails for me with -m32.
Thanks for the heads up, fixed thusly, applied.
2016-03-01 Eric Botcazou
* gnat.dg/stack_usage3.adb: Robustify and enable for all targets.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: gnat.dg/stack_usage3.adb
==
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 06:24:58PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> --- a/gcc/omp-low.c
> +++ b/gcc/omp-low.c
> @@ -3715,6 +3715,14 @@ check_omp_nesting_restrictions (gimple *stmt,
> omp_context *ctx)
> kind == OMP_CLAUSE_DEPEND_SOURCE ? "source" : "sink");
> return false
On 01/03/16 17:33, Michael Collison wrote:
> This patches addresses PR 70014, where the predicates and operand do not
> match and could cause problems with the register allocator. Tested
> successfully on
>
> arm-none-linux-gnueabi
> arm-none-linux-gnuabihf
> armeb-none-linux-gnuabihf
> arm-none-e
On Mar 1, 2016, at 6:20 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> When switching from gdb 7.10 to the newly released gdb 7.11 on Solaris,
> all simulate-thread tests started to timeout
Ok. If a domain expert prefers a different strategy, I’m fine with anything
better as well.
Ok.
Note, though, that I'm in the process of deprecating mep...
On 03/01/2016 11:05 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Note, though, that I'm in the process of deprecating mep...
Can we make that official? 64402, 49401 & 24998 go away when MEP is
deprecated.
jeff
> Can we make that official? 64402, 49401 & 24998 go away when MEP is
> deprecated.
We can, what's the next step? I announced intent in Dec, nobody
commented or stepped up to take it.
On 03/01/2016 11:26 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Can we make that official? 64402, 49401 & 24998 go away when MEP is
deprecated.
We can, what's the next step? I announced intent in Dec, nobody
commented or stepped up to take it.
Write a patch to deprecate it in config.gcc (search for openbsd2 to he
The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_6_wmisleadingindentation_vs_goto_fail/d0eonwd
> The way they split up the warning looks designed to trick you.
> sslKeyEx
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:07:56PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:59:57PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > just like with the compiler gomp testsuite, we need to add -Wno-hsa to
> > options when compiling libgomp testcases in order not to have "excess
> > errors" failu
Hi,
as Jakub requested in another thread, this patch deals with HSA
"excess errors" in the gomp compiler testsuite by passing -Wno-hsa to
all of them. IIUC, that passing it in the second parameter of
*-dg-runtest (as opposed to the third) means that it will apply even
tests that have their own dg
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:39:18PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> as Jakub requested, this patch deals with HSA "excess errors" in the
> libgomp library testsuite by passing -Wno-hsa to all of them. IIUC,
> that passing it in the second parameter of dg-runtest (as opposed to
> the third) means that
Evandro Menezes wrote:
>
> The meaning of these attributes are not clear to me. Is there a
> reference somewhere about which insns are FP or SIMD or neither?
The meaning should be clear, "fp" is a floating point instruction, "simd" a
SIMD one
as defined in ARM-ARM.
> Indeed, I had to add the Y
On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> as Jakub requested in another thread, this patch deals with HSA
> "excess errors" in the gomp compiler testsuite by passing -Wno-hsa to
> all of them.
> OK for trunk?
Ok.
On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> What is the difference betwee the $flags and $default-extra-cflags
> arguments to dg-runtest? You seem to stick -Wno-hsa into the former,
> which to me looks like it will be mentioned as part of the test
> names (e.g. when cycling through -O* op
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:31:26AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 09:31 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >The following is another issue with macros from system headers. In this case
> >bool is defined in a system header to expand to _Bool and the "is promoted
> >to"
> >warning didn't trigger b
On 03/01/16 13:02, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Evandro Menezes wrote:
The meaning of these attributes are not clear to me. Is there a
reference somewhere about which insns are FP or SIMD or neither?
The meaning should be clear, "fp" is a floating point instruction, "simd" a
SIMD one
as defined in A
On March 1, 2016 7:51:01 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm
wrote:
>The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
>confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_6_wmisleadingindentation_vs_goto_fail/d0eonwd
>
>> The way
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:08:03PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:31:26AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 02/24/2016 09:31 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > >The following is another issue with macros from system headers. In this
> > >case
> > >bool is defined in a system heade
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 11:26 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >>Can we make that official? 64402, 49401 & 24998 go away when MEP is
> >>deprecated.
> >
> >We can, what's the next step? I announced intent in Dec, nobody
> >commented or stepped up to take
htdocs/gcc-6/porting_to.html is now multiple screens of text.
The attached patch adds "id" attributes to every h2, h3 and h4 element
in the page, so that people can create URLs that reference specific
subsections of the guide.
Validates.
OK to commit?Index: htdocs/gcc-6/porting_to.html
=
> Write a patch to deprecate it in config.gcc (search for openbsd2 to help
> you find the right spot) and an update to the gcc6 webpage.
How's this?
Index: htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/chang
This is similar to Mark Gilsse's patch in the OP, except that it ensures that
the expression will fold back to a single condition. I did include Richi's
patch from #c6 to make it more likely to trigger asap.
I'd appreciate feedback on the match.pd changes; it's my first time looking
into this new
When stack checking is entirely done by the middle-end (default if no specific
back-end support or forced by -fstack-check=generic), the checking for the
prologue is actually done in the caller with a default range and the hope is
that the callee's static frame is not too large... There are a f
Just add -masm=intel asm dialect alternative.
2016-03-01 Uros Bizjak
PR target/70027
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_output_call_insn): Add -masm=intel
asm dialect alternatives to explicit GOTPCREL calls.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-03-01 Uros Bizjak
PR target/70027
* gcc.ta
On Feb 26, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> we would like a place to have some HSA-specific tests
Sounds reasonable.
> I have very little experience with tcl, expect or DejaGNU and would
> appreciate very much any feedback or guidance of anyone more
> experience in these areas. In parti
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:51 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> The wording of our output from -Wmisleading-indentation is rather
> confusing, as noted by Reddit user "sysop073" here:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/47pejg/gcc_6_wmisleadingindentation_vs_goto_fail/d0eonwd
>
>> The way t
Please see the original message:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-03/msg2.html
I have to send the patches separately, as together they are blocked by
the spam filter. This is part 1:
---
Fritz Reese
From 00eaf54e4cc4bb63bfbcb1ffab97cb9b593f2c6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fritz O. Ree
Please see the original thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-03/msg2.html.
I have to send the patches separately, as together they cause me to be
blocked for spamming. This is patch 2:
---
Fritz Reese
From 2f7077c45fdcf2d05554d9d2e22fc5261bd95661 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fritz O.
Please see the original thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-03/msg2.html.
I have to send the patches separately, as together they cause me to be
blocked for spamming. This is patch 3:
---
Fritz Reese
From 93e96b8a9e62c0413e6d9d33c01fa7825ecd9ee4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fritz O.
On 03/01/2016 02:20 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Mar 1, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
This patch improves sanitizer testsuite to avoid sporadic failures, especially
when [cross-]testing on a remote machine.
There are several unstable sanitizer tests in GCC testsuite (e.g.,
g++.dg/
Please see the original thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-03/msg2.html.
I have to send the patches separately, as together they cause me to be
blocked for spamming. This is the big one, patch 4. It is compressed
with gzip since it is 150KB uncompressed.
---
Fritz Reese
0004-2016-0
I noticed that several of the power9 tests do not check if the power9 support
was built into the compiler. This patch fixes this. I'm going to apply these
patches as being obvious.
2016-03-01 Michael Meissner
PR target/70033
* gcc.target/powerpc/p9-lxvx-stxvx-1.c: Make sure c
Another step along the path to fixing 69196. As I was investigating the
regression, one of the things that became quite clear was that we'd
greatly increased the number of PHIs and many of the PHI arguments were
constants (which in turn never coalesce and thus generate a constant
initializa
Hi
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:47:49PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:39:18PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > as Jakub requested, this patch deals with HSA "excess errors" in the
> > libgomp library testsuite by passing -Wno-hsa to all of them. IIUC,
> > that passing it i
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:47:46PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> well, exactly what I wrote in the original email and what you have
> quoted (and me as well) above. But let me quote the dejagnu source
> comment of dg-runtest, which is perhaps more clear:
>
> # FLAGS is a set of options to alway
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 20:45 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:11:11AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > Where are these canonicalization rules described?
> >
> > swap_commutative_operands_p?
>
> That function never swaps reg+reg, or I don't see it.
commutative_ope
It's a regression present on all active branches caused by the RTL enhanced
load motion optimization (-fgcse-lm), which performs PRE on "simple" MEMs and
discards all other memory references. The problem is that it fails to discard
a particular memory reference present in a REG_EQUAL note:
(in
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 10:39 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> Here is the updated patch with new testcases. OK for trunk?
>
>
> This is not a complete patch.
>
> Please update type_is_empty_record_p to use the definition from the recent
> discussion:
Here a
Hi David,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, David Malcolm wrote:
> The attached patch adds "id" attributes to every h2, h3 and h4 element
> in the page, so that people can create URLs that reference specific
> subsections of the guide.
this is a great idea!
Allow me to suggest some potential tweaks wrt to the
This patch clamps the number of statements to copy when not threading
across a loop backedge in the FSM/backwards threader. This fixes the
bulk of the regression in 69196. I'm still evaluating whether or not
69196 can be closed, but at the least it's a P2 now.
Bootstrapped and regression t
On 03/01/2016 12:42 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:29:25AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/01/2016 11:26 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Can we make that official? 64402, 49401 & 24998 go away when MEP is
deprecated.
We can, what's the next step? I announced intent in Dec, nobody
On 03/01/2016 12:41 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
htdocs/gcc-6/porting_to.html is now multiple screens of text.
The attached patch adds "id" attributes to every h2, h3 and h4 element
in the page, so that people can create URLs that reference specific
subsections of the guide.
Validates.
OK to commi
On 03/01/2016 12:45 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Write a patch to deprecate it in config.gcc (search for openbsd2 to help
you find the right spot) and an update to the gcc6 webpage.
How's this?
Looks good to me. Obviously you'll need appropriate ChangeLogs. OK
with the ChangeLogs added.
jeff
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> - new scalar_storage_order type attribute in C,
> - ABI change for SPARC 64-bit,
> - automatic enabling of -mstackrealign with SSE for Windows 32-bit.
+ A new type attribute scalar_storage_order applying to
+ structures and unions has been int
> How about saying "It specifies the storage order..."?
>
> And "in structures and unions"?
OK.
> How about "...is passed to a subprogram in slot #15..."?
OK.
> Okay with the changes above.
Thanks!
--
Eric Botcazou
On 02/25/2016 08:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Recently I had the opportunity to learn about a number of rather
subtle style conventions sometimes enforced during code reviews
(though not inconsistently followed in GCC code). To help find
these kinds of problems before a patch is submitted and cut
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
