On 01-09-15 12:15, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 31/08/15 19:39, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
* builtin-types.def (DEF_FUNCTION_TYPE_VAR_6): Define.
Committed attached follow-up patch to fix the ada build.
Thanks,
- Tom
0001-Fix-gomp-4_0-branch-ada-build.patch
Fix gomp-4_0-branch ada build
2015-0
Hi,
This (rather trivial) patch fixes PR65210. The ICE happens because code
wasn't handling io_low attribute where it is supposed to.
If this is ok, could someone commit please? I don't have commit
access.
Regards
Senthil
gcc/ChangeLog
2015-09-02 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
PR t
> Hmm, in that case errnum must be set to 0. What about the attached
> patch, which prints the existing message if errnum == 0, and the new
> and improved only for errnum > 0?
OK. Thanks for the patch.
FX
On 01/09/15 23:07, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/01/2015 05:02 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
v2: Include all options and not only "dg-do run ...".
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
2015-09-01 Sebastian Huber
testsuite/*: Use 's/\*-\*-cygwin\* /&*-*-rtems* /' to add RTEMS
target selector to all tests that
Hi Gerald,
On 01/09/15 18:29, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This wwwdocs patch adds an entry to the GCC 6 changes page about the
aarch64 target attributes and pragmas support.
Thanks for thinking of this, Kyrill.
Thanks for the feedback.
Index: htdocs/gcc
On 12-08-15 20:31, James Norris wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
index bc54067..eee5340 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
@@ -5864,8 +5864,7 @@ void
finish_oacc_declare (gfc_namespace *ns, enum sym_flavor flavor)
{
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 11:18 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:16:27AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> open(unit=10, file='junko.dir',iostat=ios,action='read',access='stream')
>>> if (ios.ne.0) call abort
>>> read(10, iosta
Hi!
This fixes ICE with ordered simd (broken with the doacross changes; the
second chunk) and allows ordered simd inside of simd regions.
As it is still unclear whether ordered simd is required to be only closely
nested inside of simd construct or declare simd functions (i.e. lexically
nested), or
This makes recursive_timed_mutex work for non-pthreads targets where
__gthread_mutex_t and __gthread_recursive_mutex_t are not the same
type. Thanks to Sebastian for the bug report and patch.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 852d09122561d301b2980b6f9c97e88c5499006c
Author: J
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
The refcounted basic_string implementation contains several data races
on _M_refcount:
There are several bug reports about races in basic_string in bugzilla
(some might even have been closed as wontfix because of the new
implementation). Does this als
+/* Optimize (x >> c) << c into x & (-1
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 17:07:53 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> * gimplify.c (gimplify_scan_omp_clauses): Handle
> struct element GOMP_MAP_FIRSTPRIVATE_POINTER.
Have you seen this?
gcc/gimplify.c: In function ‘void gimplify_scan_omp_clauses(tree_node**,
gimple_statement_base**, omp_re
Hi Richard,
> Note that I'm curious what
> the actual bug is - is it that (double) sNaN creates a sNaN? Then the fix
> should be elsewhere, in constant folding itself
> (fold_convert_const_real_from_real
> or real_convert).
>
> If that isn't the bug you have very many other passes to fix for the
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sujoy Saraswati wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> Note that I'm curious what
>> the actual bug is - is it that (double) sNaN creates a sNaN? Then the fix
>> should be elsewhere, in constant folding itself
>> (fold_convert_const_real_from_real
>> or real_convert).
>>
>> If
> >This patch is an attempt to fix
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280. I have written up
> >an analysis of the bug there.
> >
> >When cgraph_node::create_wrapper() updates the callgraph for the new
> >function, it sets the can_throw_external flag to false, even when
> >wrapping a
> CCP and other passes ultimatively end up using fold-const.c:const_{unop,binop}
> for constant folding so that is where the fix should go to (or to real.c).
> That
> will automatically handle other passes doing similar transforms.
Thanks for the tip. I will modify my fix and post it.
Regards,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> Generally we don't try to fold (long)(A-B) into (long)A - (long)B because it
> results in more operations. On the other hand, this fold is wanted when we
> want to explore as many canonical opportunities as possible. Tree affine is
> defin
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> When calling get_shiftadd_cost, the mult_op is stripped at caller places.
> We should look into unnecessary conversion in op1 before checking equality,
> otherwise it computes wrong shiftadd cost. This patch picks this small
> issue up.
>
>
This is a set of patches to reduce the compile-time overhead of immediate
generation on AArch64.
There have been discussions and investigations into reducing the overhead of
immediate generation
using various caching strategies. However the statistics showed some of the
expensive immediate
loops
This patch reimplements aarch64_bitmask_imm using bitwise arithmetic rather
than a slow binary
search. The algorithm searches for a sequence of set bits. If there are no more
set bits and not all
bits are set, it is a valid mask. Otherwise it determines the distance to the
next set bit and
check
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This fixes an ICE by adding a NULL check. Bootstrapped and regtested for
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied to trunk. Does this need to be ported to
> gcc-5-branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> --
> gcc/
>
> 2015-09-01 Ilya Enkovich
>
aarch64_internal_mov_immediate uses loops iterating over all legal bitmask
immediates to find
2-instruction immediate combinations. One loop is quadratic and despite being
extremely expensive
very rarely finds a matching immediate (43 matches in all of SPEC2006 but none
are emitted in final
code
Remove aarch64_bitmasks, aarch64_build_bitmask_table and aarch64_bitmasks_cmp
as they are no longer
used by the immediate generation code.
No change in generated code, passes GCC regression tests/bootstrap.
ChangeLog:
2015-09-02 Wilco Dijkstra
* gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_
The code that emits a movw with an add/sub is hardly ever used, and all cases
in actual code are
already covered by mov+movk, so it is redundant (an example of such an
immediate is
0x00000abcul).
Passes GCC regression tests/bootstrap. Minor changes in generated code due to
movk being us
Cleanup the remainder of aarch64_internal_mov_immediate. Compute the number of
16-bit aligned 16-bit
masks that are all-zeroes or all-ones, and emit the smallest sequence using a
single loop skipping
either all-ones or all-zeroes.
Passes GCC regression tests/bootstrap. Minor changes in generated
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Bill Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The following simple test fails when attempting to convert a vector
>> > shift-by-scalar into a vector shif
2015-09-02 15:35 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This fixes an ICE by adding a NULL check. Bootstrapped and regtested for
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied to trunk. Does this need to be ported to
>> gcc-5-branch?
>>
>> Thanks,
I was naiively using ->get_constructor in IPA PTA without proper
checking on wheter that succeeds. Now I tried to use ctor_for_folding
but that isn't good as we want to analyze non-const globals in IPA
PTA and we need to analyze their initialiers as well.
Thus I'm trying below with ctor_for_anal
On 01/09/15 11:40, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi James,
On 01/09/15 10:25, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:36:50PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Some comments below.
Thanks, I'll incorporate them, with one clarification inline.
And here's the updated patch.
Thanks,
Kyrill
20
>
> I was naiively using ->get_constructor in IPA PTA without proper
> checking on wheter that succeeds. Now I tried to use ctor_for_folding
> but that isn't good as we want to analyze non-const globals in IPA
> PTA and we need to analyze their initialiers as well.
>
> Thus I'm trying below with
On 01/09/15 17:42 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/09/15 16:56 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
I don't understand how a new gcc may not support __atomic builtins on
ints. How it is even possible? That's a portable API provided by
recent gcc'
Hi,
The aarch64_vldX/aarch64_vstX expanders used for the vldX/vstX AdvSIMD
intrisics in Q mode called vec_load_lanes, witch shuffles the vectors
to match the layout expected by the vectorizer.
We do not want this to happen when the intrinsics are called directly
by the end-user code.
This patch
On 01/09/15 17:54, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:50:27PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I can't comment on the patch itself, but I noticed that in the testsuite
addition, you've gathered all the "dg-final" clauses at the end.
I think that this is consistent with existing practi
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2015-09-02 15:35 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This fixes an ICE by adding a NULL check. Bootstrapped and regtested for
>>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied to trunk. D
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > I was naiively using ->get_constructor in IPA PTA without proper
> > checking on wheter that succeeds. Now I tried to use ctor_for_folding
> > but that isn't good as we want to analyze non-const globals in IPA
> > PTA and we need to analyze their in
Ilya Verbin writes:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:58:22 +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Woops. can you send me the exact two libraries so that I can see what's
>> going wrong? You can quickly file an issue to
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=libabigail or just
>> send me
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I was naiively using ->get_constructor in IPA PTA without proper
> > > checking on wheter that succeeds. Now I tried to use ctor_for_folding
> > > but that isn't good as we want to analyze non-const
Jeff Law writes:
> On 05/21/2015 02:46 PM, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for these thoughts.
>>
>> I tried but still can't prove this transformation will not introduce
>> extra pointer overflow even given it's reassociation with vfp, although
>> my first impression is it do will not introduce ex
Hi Jeff,
On 01/09/15 23:13, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/01/2015 09:04 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This first patch introduces the negcc and notcc optabs that should
expand to a conditional
negate or a conditional bitwise complement operation.
These are used in ifcvt.c to transform code of the
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
>> The refcounted basic_string implementation contains several data races
>> on _M_refcount:
>
>
> There are several bug reports about races in basic_string in bugzilla (some
> might even have been clo
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The aarch64_vldX/aarch64_vstX expanders used for the vldX/vstX AdvSIMD
> intrisics in Q mode called vec_load_lanes, witch shuffles the vectors
> to match the layout expected by the vectorizer.
>
> We do not want this to ha
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/p5600-bonding.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/p5600-bonding.c
> > index 0890ffa..20c26ca 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/p5600-bonding.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/p5600-bonding.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > /* { dg-do co
Added comment to _M_dispose and restored ChangeLog entry.
Please take another look.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 01/09/15 17:42 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Jonathan Wakely
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/09/15 16:56 +0200, Dmitry Vyuk
On 1 September 2015 at 16:04, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 25 August 2015 at 17:31, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>> Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
>>> TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS and perform effective_target support tests using
>>> the
On 02/09/15 15:49 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
The refcounted basic_string implementation contains several data races
on _M_refcount:
There are several bug reports about races in basic_string in bug
On 02/09/15 16:01 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
Added comment to _M_dispose and restored ChangeLog entry.
Please take another look.
Thanks, this is OK for trunk.
I assume you are covered by the Google company-wide copyright
assignment, so someone just needs to commit it, which I can do if you
li
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch is a new approach to fix PR66388. IVO today computes iv_use with
> iv_cand which has at least same type precision as the use. On 64bit
> platforms like AArch64, this results in different iv_cand created for each
> address type i
>
> Hmm, no, ipa-ref list should be enough (unless we start field-sensitive
> analysis or need NULL inits for correctness). Still have to figure out
> how to walk the list and how the reference would look like (what
> is ref->use? IPA_REF_ADDR? can those be speculative?)
Yep, it should be IPA_
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > I was naiively using ->get_constructor in IPA PTA without proper
> > > > checking on wheter that succeeds. Now I tried to use ctor_for_folding
> > > > but that isn't good as we want to a
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I was naiively using ->get_constructor in IPA PTA without proper
> > > > > checking on wheter that succeeds. Now I tried to use ctor_f
Thank you.
Yes, I am covered by the Google copyright assignment, and I have commit access.
I don't commit frequently, hope I didn't mess up things fundamentally :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=227403
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 02/09/15
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:30:07AM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > On 09/01/2015 11:18 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:16:27AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>> open(unit=10,
> >>> file='junko.dir',iostat=ios,action
On 02 Sep 2015, at 02:08, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:24:55AM +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what the best way to achieve multiple goals is, but the
>>> current behavior makes it so you need --isa=any (and a final binary
>>> with weird ABI tag) to have a binary that
>
>
> On 19/08/15 17:57, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 08/12/2015 08:31 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >> 2015-08-10 Kyrylo Tkachov
> >>
> >> * ifcvt.c (struct noce_if_info): Add then_simple, else_simple,
> >> then_cost, else_cost fields. Change branch_cost field to
> >> unsigned int.
> >>
On 09/01/2015 06:25 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Having now made this change, I don't think the added complexity
of three declarations and two trivial definitions of the new
c_decl_implicit function across five files is an improvement,
Three declarations? Isn't declaring it in c-common.h enough?
Hi Vladimir,
On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch is for
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
>
> The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64.
>
> Committed as rev. 227382.
>
Since this patch, I can see:
gcc.dg/vect/s
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 02:21:14PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 17:07:53 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > * gimplify.c (gimplify_scan_omp_clauses): Handle
> > struct element GOMP_MAP_FIRSTPRIVATE_POINTER.
>
> Have you seen this?
>
> gcc/gimplify.c: In function ‘
On 02/09/15 16:18, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
On 19/08/15 17:57, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/12/2015 08:31 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
2015-08-10 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (struct noce_if_info): Add then_simple, else_simple,
then_cost, else_cost fields. Change branch_cost field to
unsigne
Hello, Honza. David Li said you might be able to help me get this
patch into GCC trunk. I sent mail for this on August 27, but didn't
get a reply. It's a small change to make these two options work
together:
profile-func-internal-id=0 coverage-callback=1
Let me know what I can do to get this s
Hi,
Combine canonicalizes certain AND masks in a comparison with zero into extracts
of the widest
register type. During matching these are expanded into a very inefficient
sequence that fails to
match. For example (x & 2) == 0 is matched in combine like this:
Failed to match this instruction:
(
On 14/08/15 19:57, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
I'm glad it appears to be working to everyone's
satisfaction now. I've just committed it as r226901, with only a
context adjustment to account for a change in use_register_for_decl in
function.c. /me crosses fingers :-)
Here's the patch as checked in:
This PR asks for a better error wrt empty enums. So I've handled
empty enum specially.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-09-02 Marek Polacek
PR c/67432
* c-parser.c (c_parser_enum_specifier): Give a better error for
an empty enum.
* g
I've started work on reviving the FDPIC support patch for the SH
target, which was proposed upstream in 2010 then abandoned:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01464.html
Right now I'm in the process of determining what parts can be applied
as-is to current gcc, and what parts need to
Hi,
the patch below makes target_follows_kernelizable_pattern stricter by
adding a few checks for clauses that have to preclude kernelization.
Committed to the branch.
Thanks,
Martin
2015-09-02 Martin Jambor
* omp-low.c (target_follows_kernelizable_pattern): Parallel
num_th
Hi Wilco,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 06:09:24PM +0100, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Combine canonicalizes certain AND masks in a comparison with zero into
> extracts of the widest
> register type. During matching these are expanded into a very inefficient
> sequence that fails to
> match. For example (x
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This PR asks for a better error wrt empty enums. So I've handled
> empty enum specially.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On 09/02/2015 11:09 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
Combine canonicalizes certain AND masks in a comparison with zero into extracts
of the widest
register type. During matching these are expanded into a very inefficient
sequence that fails to
match. For example (x & 2) == 0 is matched in combine
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
> Also, according to Joseph Myers, there was some unresolved
> disagreement that stalled (and eventually sunk) the old patch, so if
> anyone's still around who has objections to it, could you speak up and
> let me know what's wrong? Kaz Kojima seems to have a
A couple of reduction tests inside libgomp had xfails because Julian
added those tests before my reduction patches were ready. Most of them
should pass unmodified, but I had to found a bug in
loop-reduction-wv-p-3.c, where a private variable was used without being
initialized. This patch fixes that
Sorry for the wrong advice. I thought the feature was in trunk. Rong,
can you submit the callback support to trunk?
David
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
> Matt,
>
> It seems this patch is for google branch, rather the trunk. The code for
> coverage callback function is not in tr
On 09/02/2015 07:36 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
For the record, after Bin's recent tree-ssa-ivopt improvement originated
from PR62173, this patch is not benefitial anymore.
It happens sometimes.
I have stopped working on this patch. Thanks for those time spent on
reviewing and discussing on this.
This patch by Chris Manghane avoids a compiler crash by marking
erroneous constants as invalid and turning them into error expressions
when seen. This fixes https://golang.org/issue/11541 . Bootstrapped
and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to
mainline.
Ian
Index: gcc/go/g
On 09/01/2015 10:30 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I thought about this for a minute and I don't think I need to use the
lang_hooks. I could do this change right before calling gimplify_cilk_spawn. I
have attached the fixed patch and have answered your questions below. Here are
the
On 09/02/2015 09:18 AM, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
On 19/08/15 17:57, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/12/2015 08:31 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
2015-08-10 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (struct noce_if_info): Add then_simple, else_simple,
then_cost, else_cost fields. Change branch_cost field to
un
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:59:58PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >(set (reg:CC 66 cc)
> > (compare:CC (and:DI (lshiftrt:DI (subreg:DI (reg/v:SI 76 [ xD.2641 ])
> > 0)
> > (const_int 1 [0x1]))
> > (const_int 1 [0x1]))
> > (const_int 0 [0])))
> Yea, this is an
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 07:59:45PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
>
> > Also, according to Joseph Myers, there was some unresolved
> > disagreement that stalled (and eventually sunk) the old patch, so if
> > anyone's still around who has objections to it, could
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 14:44 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Bill Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > The following simple test fails w
On 09/02/2015 09:29 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/01/2015 06:25 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Having now made this change, I don't think the added complexity
of three declarations and two trivial definitions of the new
c_decl_implicit function across five files is an improvement,
Three declarations
On Sep 2, 2015, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> One more failure to report, I'm afraid. On AArch64 Bigendian,
> aapcs64/func-ret-4.c ICEs in simplify_subreg (line refs here are from
> r227348):
Thanks. The failure mode was different in the current, revamped git
branch aoliva/pr64164, but I've just fixe
2015-09-02 Sebastian Pop
* config.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure.ac (HAVE_ISL_CTX_MAX_OPERATIONS): Detect.
* graphite-optimize-isl.c (optimize_isl): Stop computation when
PARAM_MAX_ISL_OPERATIONS is reached.
On 09/03/2015 12:34 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
2015-09-02 Sebastian Pop
* config.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure.ac (HAVE_ISL_CTX_MAX_OPERATIONS): Detect.
* graphite-optimize-isl.c (optimize_isl): Stop computation when
Anatoliy Sokolov schrieb:
Hi.
The fixed_reg_set contain all fixed and global registers. This patch
change code "fixed_regs[r] || global_regs[r]" with "TEST_HARD_REG_BIT
(fixed_reg_set, r)".
Even though technically a no-op change
TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (fixed_reg_set, r)
appears to be a test f
On 09/02/2015 04:52 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 09/03/2015 12:34 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
2015-09-02 Sebastian Pop
* config.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure.ac (HAVE_ISL_CTX_MAX_OPERATIONS): Detect.
* graphite-optimize-
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>> Thanks, will make those changes. Do you recommend a different name
>> for this flag like -fmake-comdat-functions-static?
>
> Well, the C++ ABI refers to this as "vague linkage." It may be a bit
> too long or too ABI-specific, but maybe somet
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:05:35PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 07:59:45PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
> >
> > > Also, according to Joseph Myers, there was some unresolved
> > > disagreement that stalled (and eventually sunk) the old
This patch by Chris Manghane fixes the Go frontend to report invalid
function receiver types as an error rather than crashing. This fixes
https://golang.org/issue/12324 . Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Ian
Index: gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE
===
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
Personally I think hiding that variables are pointers is confusing, and I
believe consensus is we should move away from this style. So this series
starts to do that.
patches individually bootstrapped + regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok?
Trev
Trevor Saunders (10):
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-02 Trevor Saunders
* dse.c (store_info_t): Remove typedef.
(group_info_t): Likewise.
(const_group_info_t): Likewise.
(deferred_change_t): Likewise.
(get_group_info): Adjust.
(free_store_info): Likewi
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-02 Trevor Saunders
* alias.c (alias_set_entry_d): Rename to alias_set_entry.
(alias_set_entry): Remove typedef.
(alias_set_subset_of): Adjust.
(alias_sets_conflict_p): Likewise.
(init_alias_set_entry): Likew
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* tree-ssa-ter.c (temp_expr_table_d): Rename to temp_expr_table
and remove typedef.
(new_temp_expr_table): Adjust.
(free_temp_expr_table): Likewise.
(version_to_be_replaced_p): Likewise.
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* bt-load.c (struct btr_def_group): Rename from btr_def_group_s.
(struct btr_user): Rename from btr_user_s.
(struct btr_def): Rename from btr_def_s.
(find_btr_def_group): Adjust.
(add_btr_
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* var-tracking.c (struct location_chain): Rename from
location_chain_def.
(struct variable_part): Adjust.
(variable_htab_free): Likewise.
(unshare_variable): Likewise.
(get_init_va
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* var-tracking.c (shared_hash_def): Rename to shared_hash.
(shared_hash): Remove typedef.
(struct dataflow_set): Adjust.
(shared_hash_unshare): Likewise.
(dataflow_set_merge): Likewise.
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* tree-vrp.c (struct assert_locus_d): Rename to assert_locus.
(dump_asserts_for): Adjust.
(register_new_assert_for): Likewise.
(process_assert_insertions): Likewise.
(insert_range_assertio
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* tree-ssa-loop-im.c (mem_ref_loc_p): Remove typedef.
(mem_ref_p): Likewise.
(outermost_indep_loop): Adjust.
(mem_ref_in_stmt): Likewise.
(determine_max_movement): Likewise.
(mem_r
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* dwarf2out.c (dw_attr_ref): Remove typedef.
(dw_line_info_ref): Likewise.
(pubname_ref): Likewise.
(dw_ranges_ref): Likewise.
(dw_ranges_by_label_ref): Likewise.
(comdat_type_node
Committed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=227428
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key avai
From: Trevor Saunders
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-09-03 Trevor Saunders
* dwarf2cfi.c (dw_trace_info_ref): Remove typedef.
---
gcc/dwarf2cfi.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c b/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c
index ab18062..1cfa6a7 100644
--- a/gcc/dw
On 01/09/15 23:07, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/01/2015 05:02 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
v2: Include all options and not only "dg-do run ...".
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
2015-09-01 Sebastian Huber
testsuite/*: Use 's/\*-\*-cygwin\* /&*-*-rtems* /' to add RTEMS
target selector to all tests tha
99 matches
Mail list logo
