On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 07:59:45PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Rich Felker wrote: > > > Also, according to Joseph Myers, there was some unresolved > > disagreement that stalled (and eventually sunk) the old patch, so if > > anyone's still around who has objections to it, could you speak up and > > let me know what's wrong? Kaz Kojima seems to have approved the patch > > at the time so I'm confused what the issue was/is. > > It's patch 1/3 (architecture-independent) that had the disagreement (and > patch 3/3 depends on patch 1/3). > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01462.html
So this is only for __fpscr_values? In that case I think the right solution is just to follow up with getting rid of __fpscr_values, if it's not already done: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60138 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513 53513 is marked fixed, but I didn't follow up to confirm that the actual problems I reported in 60138 are fixed; I'll do some more research on this. But if all goes well, we can just drop 1/3. Thanks for the quick reply! Rich
