On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patch increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS for CPUs with
> high branch cost.
> Bootstrap and make check are in progress.
> The patch boosts (up to 2,5 times improve) several benchmarks compiled
> with "-Ofast" on Silver
Hi all:
This patch contain lots typo fix for IRA module by aspell :)
ChangeLog
2014-10-13 Kito Cheng
* ira.c: Fix typo in comment.
* ira.h: Ditto.
* ira-build.c: Ditto.
* ira-color.c: Ditto.
* ira-emit.c: Ditto.
* ira-int.h: Ditto.
* ir
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 06:42 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>> A colleague has suggested a perhaps nicer syntax:
>>
>> __builtin_call_chain(pointer, call) where call must be a call expression
>
> I like this.
>
> Unlike the other suggestions, it d
As reported by Alan, the Ada compiler doesn't build anymore if you compile it
with -fno-inline because cuintp.c references a private function of uintp.adb.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on all active branches.
2014-10-13 Eric Botcazou
Alan Modra
PR ada/63225
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This patch was written a long time ago by Jakub and has been in Fedora
> gcc for some time. All I did was rebase it to current gcc trunk
> and add a testcase. Back when it was originally proposed the issue was
> that because DWARF was genera
Manuel López-Ibáñez writes:
> A few cleanups in line-map code. Bootstrapped and regression tested on
> x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks for doing this.
> OK?
Yes, barring this little nit:
[...]
> Index: libcpp/line-map.c
> ===
> --- lib
On 12/10/14 21:41 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch moves _M_size in std::list to a place where it should be
easier (no offsetof) to access from an iterator (it doesn't matter
when you access it from the main std::list object). It does not take
advantage of it yet, that can be done
On 13 October 2014 10:52, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Manuel López-Ibáñez writes:
>
>> Index: libcpp/line-map.c
>> ===
>> --- libcpp/line-map.c (revision 216098)
>> +++ libcpp/line-map.c (working copy)
>> @@ -29,12 +29,10 @@ along with t
Richard,
Here is updated patch (part1) for extended if conversion.
Second part of patch will be sent later.
Changelog.
2014-10-13 Yuri Rumyantsev
* tree-if-conv.c (cgraph.h): Add include file to detect function clone.
(flag_force_vectorize): New variable.
(edge_predicate): New function.
(se
Richard,
Here is second part of patch which includes
1. One particular phi node recognition - if phi function has more
than 2 arguments but it has only two really different arguments and
one argument has the only occurrence. This is important for
conditional scalar reduction conversion, e.g. for
Hi,
This is the second patch of the work to fix:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810
and removes the CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS macro, which now permits subregs of
vector registers to work correctly on aarch64_be.
NOTE: This patch depends upon the following:
[AArch64] [BE] [1/2] Ma
On 16/04/14 17:06 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
C++11 [ptr.align].
This should probably not be inline. But for now this avoids any ABI
changes.
* libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/align/1.cc: New file.
* libstdc++-v3/include/std/memory (align): New function.
Fixed (the new function should be
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:49:00PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> This is the last common infrastructure patch in the series.
> (Next patches will contain tests for libgomp testsuite and MIC specific
> things)
>
> It introduces 2 new options:
> 1. -foffload==
>By default, GCC will build offload
On 10/02/2014 09:14 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 09/17/2014 09:08 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 08:38 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is the third version of the patch. A list of changes since last
>> version:
>> * move config to contrib so that it's _not_ enabled by defa
On 13 Oct 12:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> But I'd like to understand why is this one needed.
> Why should the compilers care? Aggregates layout and alignment of
> integral/floating types must match between host and offload compilers, sure,
> but isn't that something streamed already in the LTO bytec
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
> trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for merging and improving my patches!
If you have the time maybe you could also look at the put_time patch. Unlike
get_time it do
On 10 Oct 13:14, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 12:55, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch introduces two IPA passes used by Pointer Bounds Checker. One
> >pass creates clones for instrumentation. The other one transforms unneeded
> >functions into thunks.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> Now, I wonder on which OS and why does config/tls.m4 CHECK_GCC_TLS
> actually fail? Can you figure that out?
>
On Android check passes with --disable-tls (standard while building
gcc for Android as TLS is not supported in bionic) and fails with
--enable-tls (i686-linux-android/libgomp/conftest.
On 10 Oct 12:50, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 13:04, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch adds intrumentation of calls and returns into instrumentation
> >pass.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> >2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * tree-chkp.c (chkp_add_bounds_to_ret_stmt): New.
> >
On 10 Oct 12:10, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 13:06, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch adds bounds initialization for address taken input arguments.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> >2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * tree-chkp.c (chkp_instrument_function): Store bounds for
> >
I need to collect data from Haswell, but the patch should not help
it's performance much, just increase code size.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_I
I updated the patch with a comment. Actually, Manuel handed me this
patch just to help me get familiar with the process of submitting and
testing.
Generating this one with git diff looks different so I'm not sure if
that's a problem or not.
Thanks,
Anthony
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:09 PM, wrot
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for merging and improving my patches!
Sorry it's taken so long, I needed to get
2014-10-09 22:51 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/08/14 13:12, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch adds an assignment processing function which is used by lnliner
>> for newly generated stores.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ilya
>> --
>> 2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
>>
>> * tree-chkp.c (chkp_copy
On 12/10/14 06:49 -0700, Siva Chandra wrote:
Hello,
Attached is a patch which adds xmethods for std::array, std::deque,
std::forward_list, std::list and std::vector. There were already
couple of xmethods existing for std::vector, but this patch adds more
over them.
Committed - thanks!
On 15/04/14 23:20 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
Described in [ext.manip].
* libstdc++-v3/include/std/iomanip (_Put_time): New struct.
(put_time): New manipulator.
(operator<<): New overloaded function.
* libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/manipulators/extended/put_time/char/1.cc:
* libstdc++-v3/t
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for merging and improving my patches!
If you have the time maybe you could also
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 12/10/14 06:49 -0700, Siva Chandra wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Attached is a patch which adds xmethods for std::array, std::deque,
>> std::forward_list, std::list and std::vector. There were already
>> couple of xmethods existing for std:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS for CPUs with
> > high branch cost.
> > Bootstrap and make check are in progress.
> > The patch boosts (up to 2,5 times improve) several benchmarks compiled
> > with
On 09 Oct 13:04, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 13:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch introduces functions to handle static pointers and static bounds.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> >2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * tree-chkp.c (MAX_STMTS_IN_STATIC_CHKP_CTOR): New.
> > (
Hi,
this patch fixes pasto in ipa-polymorphic-call.c. Of course I was not intending
to compare
offset+64 with offset ;)
Honza
PR bootstrap/63496
* ipa-polymorphic-call.c (extr_type_from_vtbl_ptr_store): Fix pasto.
Index: ipa-polymorphic-call.c
On 13/10/14 13:10 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for merging and improving my pat
On 10/11/2014 10:19 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
After few days of measurement and tuning, I was able to get numbers to the
following shape:
Execution times (seconds)
phase setup : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
1412 kB ( 0%) ggc
phase opt and generate : 27.
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > Seeing Rohit got good results it has struck me that perhaps one of the
> > patches I had previously reverted, to be able to compile GCC in the first
> > place, interfered with this fix -- I backed out all the subseque
> >
> >35% means that 35% of all function bodies are compared with something else?
> >That feels pretty high.
> >but overall numbers are not so terrible.
>
> Currently, the pass is able to merge 32K functions. As you know, we group
> functions to so called classes.
> According to stats, average
On 10 Oct 10:14, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 08:24, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >On 09 Oct 12:09, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>On 10/08/14 13:16, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>This patch introduces structures and manipulation functions used by simple
> >>>checker optimizations. Structures are used
Hi,
this patch triggers assert in tree-inline that verify that array type and its
main variant have same size
(as pointer). In this case we have two types that do have same size, but the
expression is different.
It is created in both cases by layout_type becuase C++ FE calls layout_type
before
Hi,
After Jakub's pre-approval
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-10/msg00084.html
I have committed the small attached patch as r216147.
2014-10-13 Christophe Lyon
* Makefile.in: (check-%): Update comment, as RUNTESTFLAGS no
longer impact parallelization.
Christophe.
Index: gcc
On 10 Oct 10:11, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 08:52, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>
> >>THanks, Jeff
> >
> >With this code we remove user builtins calls coming from source code.
> >E.g.:
> >
> >p2 = (int *)__bnd_init_ptr_bounds (p1); *p2 = 0;
> >
> >which means p2 has value of p1 but has default bounds
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to add missing __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV__ predefined
marco(ACLE 2.0) into TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS.
Is it Okay to commit?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-10-13 Renlin Li
* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS): Add ACLE 2.0 predefined
marco __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV__.
d
On 13/10/14 14:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/10/14 13:10 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to remove unused variables and marco.
Is it Okay to commit?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-10-13 Renlin Li
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (ARM_DEFAULT_PCS, arm_pcs_variant): Delete.
Regards,
Renlin LiFrom 88b6dc7fccf70c140070fbc5472d9bc1a8590754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Committed to git branch dmalcolm/jit:
"expect" has a default buffer size of 2000 bytes ("match_max").
If the testsuite programs send large amounts of data to stdout/stderr,
they could overwhelm this buffer.
Avoid this.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.jit:
* jit.dg/harness.h [MAKE_DEJAGNU_H_THRE
Hi,
this patch fixes bug I introduced in
2014-06-28 Jan Hubicka
* tree-inline.c (remap_type_1): Do not duplicate fields
that are shared in between type and its main variant.
when adding the conditionals I somehow dropped else path of the test
copying TREE_TYPE of array.
Boots
On 10 Oct 10:25, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 08:19, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>So is the purpose here to expose the checks that would normally be
> >>done in the mem* routines to their caller in the hopes that doing
> >>so will expose redundant checks? Or is there some other reason?
> >
> >There a
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
Thanks.
Aldy
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 01:42, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch enables EBX in RA for x86 32bits PIC mode.
>> It was discussed here:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02513.html
>> Now there is working version with good perfo
2014-10-10 20:56 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/10/14 09:50, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Checks and and intersection removal code was added as a simple pass
>> catching trivial cases. I'm sure there are optimizations having
>> common elements with what checker optimizer does. But initially we
>> did
>-#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
>- ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel == CM_SMALL_PIC \
>- || TARGET_PECOFF)) \
>- || !flag_pic ? INVALID_REGNUM \
>- : reload_completed ? REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx) \
>+#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
>+ ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel =
On 10/13/2014 12:33 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 13 Oct 12:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
But I'd like to understand why is this one needed.
Why should the compilers care? Aggregates layout and alignment of
integral/floating types must match between host and offload compilers, sure,
but isn't that somet
On 10/11/2014 02:05 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 09/26/2014 09:46 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this is on ipa-icf-gimple.c
@@ -2827,11 +2829,19 @@ cgraph_node::verify_node (void)
{
if (verify_edge_corresponds_to_fndecl (e, decl))
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
dejagnu.exp's host_execute has a bug, which (for me) reliably breaks
the jit testsuite when running "make check" (though not when
running "make check-jit" by itself, and appears to be unpleasantly
timing-related).
See the discussion at:
http://lists.gnu.org/arc
Patch updated with the comment:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 2a64d2d..5fd6a82 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -12455,9 +12455,18 @@ ix86_address_cost (rtx x, enum machine_mode,
addr_space_t, bool)
|| REGNO (par
On 13/10/14 13:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/04/14 23:20 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
Described in [ext.manip].
* libstdc++-v3/include/std/iomanip (_Put_time): New struct.
(put_time): New manipulator.
(operator<<): New overloaded function.
* libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/manipulator
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
>> >From: Trevor Saunders
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >This changes almost all of the ggc htab that don't use the if_marked option
>> >t
I don't see significant performance changes from the patch (with and
without patch enabling ebx) on x86 in 32bits mode.
Thanks,
Evgeny
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> I've tested and benchmarked the sub-pass on x86-64 and ARM. The
>> sub-pass
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
>>> >From: Trevor Saunders
>>> >
>>> >Hi,
>>> >
>>> >This changes almost a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Hi Sterling,
>
> this series fixes two bugs in xtensa.md:
HI Max, thanks for this. I don't see a patch though.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> 2014-10-10 Max Filippov
>
> gcc/
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.h (TARGET_HARD_FLOAT_POSTINC): new macro.
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.md (*lsiu, *ssiu): add dependency on
> !TARGET_HARD_FLOAT_POSTINC.
> (*lsip, *ssip): new instructio
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> xtensa ISA never implemented FP division, reciprocal, square root and
> inverse square root as single opcode. Remove patterns that can emit
> them.
>
> 2014-10-09 Max Filippov
>
> gcc/
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.md (divsf3, *recipsf2, sqr
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Felix Yang wrote:
> Hi Sterling,
>
> I made some improvement to the patch. Two changes:
> 1. TARGET_LOOPS is now used as a condition of the doloop related
> patterns, which is more elegant.
Fine.
> 2. As the trip count register of the zero-cost loop m
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
>>-#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
>>- ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel == CM_SMALL_PIC \
>>- || TARGET_PECOFF)) \
>>- || !flag_pic ? INVALID_REGNUM \
>>- : reload_completed ? REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx) \
>>+#def
On 10/13/14 08:58, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I'll look into DOM and a possibility to use it for checks removal.
But I give higher priority to builtins instrumentation and therefore
prefer to delay this one and return to it after builtins
instrumentation work or in case there is some spare time for it
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Patch updated with the comment:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> index 2a64d2d..5fd6a82 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -12455,9 +12455,18 @@ ix86_address_cost (
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>
> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>
> PR target/8340
> PR middle-end/47602
> PR rtl-optimization/55458
> * gcc.target/i386/pic-1.c: Remove dg-error as test should pass now.
>
> Here is a new rematerialization sub-pass of LRA.
>
> I've tested and benchmarked the sub-pass on x86-64 and ARM. The
> sub-pass permits to generate a smaller code in average on both
> architecture (although improvement no-significant), adds < 0.4%
> additional compilation time in -O2 mode o
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
ENOPATCH
jeff
On 10/13/14 08:53, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
ChangeLog for testsuite:
2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
PR target/8340
PR middle-end/47602
PR rtl-optimization/55458
* gcc.target/i386/pic-1.c: Remove dg-error as test should pass now.
* gcc.target/i386/
Thanks for the comments.
The patch checked the usage of teh trip count register, making sure
that it is not used in the loop body other than the doloop_end or
lives past the doloop_end instruction, as the following code snippet
shows:
+ /* Scan all the blocks to make sure they don't use iter_reg
On 10/13/14 08:51, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I had assumed the gimple_call_set_fndecl was a nop if we didn't
change the fndecl. Is that not the case?
Right. But (!fndecl_nochk) doesn't mean we didn't change fndecl because there
is another set to fndecl above.
Thanks for clarifying.
This is OK w
Reattached.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
>
>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>
>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>
>> PR target/8340
>> PR middle-end/47602
>> PR rtl-optimization/55458
>>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Reattached.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>>
>>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>>
>>> PR target/83
On 10/13/14 08:07, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Tests instrumentation are still needed. With some basic tests and
instrumentation this will be OK.
I hate to be harping tests, but few developers are going to be
familiar with the MPX and related infrastructure and those tests are
critical to helping them
On 10/13/14 06:41, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-10-13 Ilya Enkovich
* tree-chkp.c (MAX_STMTS_IN_STATIC_CHKP_CTOR): New.
(chkp_ctor_stmt_list): New.
(chkp_register_var_initializer): New.
(chkp_add_modification_to_stmt_list): New.
(chkp_output_static_bounds)
On 10/13/14 05:23, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-10-09 22:51 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
On 10/08/14 13:12, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds an assignment processing function which is used by lnliner
for newly generated stores.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
* tree-chkp.c
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
The relevant code in jit/internal-api.c was moved to jit/jit-playback.c
in 3071567787aef4a8ada8b38c890d01c19b4b998f.
gcc/ChangeLog.jit:
* configure.ac: Update a reference to jit/internal-api.c to
jit/jit-playback.c.
* configure: Regenerate
Most systems don't guard the C reentrant functions but on HP-UX 11
they are not declared
unless _REENTRANT is defined. This causes problems for configure, etc.
The attached change adds the _REENTRANT define when _HPUX_SOURCE is
defined.
A similar change was applied to HP-UX 10 three years a
On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
ENOPATCH
jeff
Sorry, patch was in original message. Attac
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>>
>> > Seeing Rohit got good results it has struck me that perhaps one of the
>> > patches I had previously reverted, to be able to compile GCC in the first
>> > plac
I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
identified by Joseph in an earlier submission:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02056.html
I've split up the current diff between trunk and th
gcc/ChangeLog:
* configure.ac (gcc_version): Expose this value for use via
AC_SUBST, since the jit code needs it within the new file
libgccjit.pc.in.
(doc_build_sys): New variable, set to "sphinx" if
sphinx is installed, falling back to "texinfo" otherwise.
The jit needs to create a temporary directory, so I need to expose
libiberty's choose_tmpdir as a public entrypoint.
include/ChangeLog:
* libiberty.h (choose_tmpdir): New prototype.
libiberty/ChangeLog:
* choose-temp.c (choose_tmpdir): Remove now-redundant local
copy of pr
This patch contains various cleanups needed by the jit, so that we can
rerun the compiler code repeatedly within the same process:
* Introduce per-file finalization routines to clean up file-static
variables.
* Make various initializations idempotent (init_ggc), or cleanup their
previous stat
This is used in a couple of places in jit/jit-playback.c to ensure
that we pop the timevar on every exit path from a function.
I could rewrite them if need be, but it does simplify things.
Written by Tom Tromey.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* timevar.h (class auto_timevar): New class.
---
gcc/timevar
On 10/13/14 11:29, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
ENOPATCH
jeff
So
Ping. Jason, do you still think the special-case for conversion ops is
inappropriate?
-cary
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 11:35 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> It seems that the problem here is more general; a template argument list is
>>> not in scope within t
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/10/2014 06:42 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>>> A colleague has suggested a perhaps nicer syntax:
>>>
>>> __builtin_call_chain(pointer, call) where call must be a call expr
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Reattached.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>>
>>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>>
>>> PR target/83
On 10/13/14 05:11, Anthony Brandon wrote:
I updated the patch with a comment. Actually, Manuel handed me this
patch just to help me get familiar with the process of submitting and
testing.
Generating this one with git diff looks different so I'm not sure if
that's a problem or not.
This version
On 10/13/14 02:09, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi all:
This patch contain lots typo fix for IRA module by aspell :)
ChangeLog
2014-10-13 Kito Cheng
* ira.c: Fix typo in comment.
* ira.h: Ditto.
* ira-build.c: Ditto.
* ira-color.c: Ditto.
* ira-emit.c: Dit
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Kito Cheng wrote:
- -1 if it is not a cost classe. */
+ -1 if it is not a cost classes. */
"a cost class", no plural here.
--
Marc Glisse
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:02:44AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Trevor Saunders
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
> >>> >F
Sometimes, cleanup_point_exprs are being added to concept definitions.
This patch allows that to happen, but removes the cleanup point during
normalization.
2014-10-13 Andrew Sutton
Fix bug related to cleanup expressions in concept definitions.
* gcc/cp/constraint.cc (check_fun
And here's the patch:
Andrew Sutton
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Sutton
wrote:
> Sometimes, cleanup_point_exprs are being added to concept definitions.
> This patch allows that to happen, but removes the cleanup point during
> normalization.
>
> 2014-10-13 Andrew Sutton
>
>
The original patch for concept introductions was not popping a
deferred access check. This fixes that problem, although I'm not sure
if we need to defer access checks at all.
2014-10-13 Andrew Sutton
Fix regression related to concept introductions.
* gcc/cp/constraint.cc (cp_pa
On 09 Oct 11:13, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 13:21, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch adds a removal of checks known to always pass into checker
> >optimization.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> >2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * tree-chkp.c (chkp_remove_check_if_pass): New.
>
Honza, not sure if this patch is idea, but this will unblock mingw
build problems. Can this one get in?
thanks,
David
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Rainer Emrich
wrote:
> The following patch fixes PR61889 for x86_64-w64-mingw32. Details can be found
> on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
On 10/11/14 03:32, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On 10 October 2014 21:13, Jeff Law wrote:
...
ISTM it would be better to find the mode of the same class that corresponds
to GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) / nregs. In your case that's obviously QImode :-)
Like this?
Or did you mean to remove the save_mode[regn
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00361.html
(sorry that my message looked like I had committed as obvious)
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Thanks. While committing, I noticed that I restricted ! to integer vectors,
where
On 10/13/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--
2014-10-13 Ilya Enkovich
* ipa-chkp.c: New.
* ipa-chkp.h: New.
* Makefile.in (OBJS): Add ipa-chkp.o.
* c-family/c-common.c (c_common_attribute_table): Fix documentation.
(c_common_format_attribute_table): Likew
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
