Dear Tobias,
I think that the patch would be much less opaque if repeated operation
to produce code were turned into functions, as I did for the defined
assignment patch; eg resolve.c(build_assignment, add_code_to_chain)?
What you have done is OK but it is HEAVY, as is much of the content of
class
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 19:13 -1000, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Oleg Endo wrote:
> >> +Added support for the built-in functions
> >> +__builtin_thread_pointer and
> >> +__builtin_set_thread_pointer. This assumes that
> >> +GBR is used to hold the
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Hmm, how would anyone else get at the "padding" info dealing with the
>> parallel? This looks broken if we need access to the type :/
>
> Yes, you need to access the type for return values, but that's not really new.
Ick :/
>> Eric, any co
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Janne Blomqvist writes:
>
>> diff --git a/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c b/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
>> index c8ecc3a..bf2250a 100644
>> --- a/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
>> +++ b/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
>> @@ -140,15 +140,21 @@ unformatted_back
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 12:01 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Consider the following test case:
>>
>> void bar (void);
>> int foo (int b, int c, int d)
>> {
>>int r = 0;
>>if (b)
>> res = b * 2 + 4;
>>if (c)
>> {
>>
Hello,
here is a fix for PR42769, where a type bound call was resolved
statically into a normal procedure call, but using the local procedure
(with the same name) instead of the original (and correct) one.
It turned out to not be OOP specific, and be a pure module loading
problem in the way we
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Janne Blomqvist writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c b/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
>>> index c8ecc3a..bf2250a 100644
>>> --- a/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
>>> +++ b/libg
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Bootstrapped&tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu.
And to be clear, bootstrapped with this patch on top:
Index: system.h
===
--- system.h(revision 194924)
+++ system.h(
On 06-Dec-12 10:14, rbmj wrote:
On 26-Nov-12 13:27, rbmj wrote:
On 11/13/2012 10:22 PM, rbmj wrote:
On 11/5/2012 12:57 PM, rbmj wrote:
This removes warnings about implicit declarations and fixes one of the
function calls in vxlib-tls.c for vxworks targets.
I got the old prototypes from
http:/
I noticed that the traverse and traverse_noresize method takes
Argument as the first template parameter. It should be moved to be the
second after the callback. In most of the cases, the type of the
Argument can be deduced from the callsite, so that the user only need
to specify the callback:
ht->
10 matches
Mail list logo
