On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote: >> Hmm, how would anyone else get at the "padding" info dealing with the >> parallel? This looks broken if we need access to the type :/ > > Yes, you need to access the type for return values, but that's not really new.
Ick :/ >> Eric, any comments? > > Richard's patch seems fine to me, modulo the name of the routine; I'd rather > use maybe_emit_group_store or something along these lines. Ok, fine with me - you're clearly more experienced with this code. Thanks, Richard. > -- > Eric Botcazou