On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Hmm, how would anyone else get at the "padding" info dealing with the
>> parallel?  This looks broken if we need access to the type :/
>
> Yes, you need to access the type for return values, but that's not really new.

Ick :/

>> Eric, any comments?
>
> Richard's patch seems fine to me, modulo the name of the routine; I'd rather
> use maybe_emit_group_store or something along these lines.

Ok, fine with me - you're clearly more experienced with this code.

Thanks,
Richard.

> --
> Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to