On 06/07/2018 04:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:11:25PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
Also, the option is not documented in doc/invoke.texi, it is just mentioned
in description of the -Walloc-size-larger-than= option, that is not enough;
it needs to be listed in the Warning
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:11:25PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > Also, the option is not documented in doc/invoke.texi, it is just mentioned
> > in description of the -Walloc-size-larger-than= option, that is not enough;
> > it needs to be listed in the Warning Options list, and it should have
> >
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Though accepting -Wno-no- seems to a general bug in the driver
> for all options that don't specify RejectNegative. It accepts
> -Wno-no-all as well. In fact, it seems to accept anything that
> starts with -Wno-, even if it's completely bogus.
No, it's
On 06/07/2018 03:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 02:56:13PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
As I mentioned in my reply to Jeff below, I'd like to backport
the fix for PR 82063 to the two release branches, GCC 7 and 8.
If there are no concerns/objections I'll go ahead and commit
th
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 02:56:13PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> As I mentioned in my reply to Jeff below, I'd like to backport
> the fix for PR 82063 to the two release branches, GCC 7 and 8.
> If there are no concerns/objections I'll go ahead and commit
> the patch to both sometime next week.
>
>
As I mentioned in my reply to Jeff below, I'd like to backport
the fix for PR 82063 to the two release branches, GCC 7 and 8.
If there are no concerns/objections I'll go ahead and commit
the patch to both sometime next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg01822.html
Thanks
Marti
