On 03/30/2015 01:23 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Jason probably knows better, but I think only real C++ types comply the One
Defintion
Type and should be merged. Anything we create artifically in compiler is
probably
not covered by this.
Agreed, compiler internals are outside the scope of the langu
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:02:57 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Silence warnings on
> > > > artificial decls.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this patch fix libgomp.c++/target-3
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:02:57 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Silence warnings on
> > > artificial decls.
> >
> > Shouldn't this patch fix libgomp.c++/target-3.C in an offloading-enab
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 19:06:39 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:02:57 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Silence warnings on
> > > > artificial decls.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this patch fix libgomp.c++/target-3.C
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 19:06:39 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:02:57 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Silence warnings on
> > > artificial decls.
> >
> > Shouldn't this patch fix libgomp.c++/target-3.C in an offloading-enable
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:02:57 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Silence warnings on
> > artificial decls.
>
> Shouldn't this patch fix libgomp.c++/target-3.C in an offloading-enabled
> configuration? It still fails...
>
> libgomp/testsuite/libg
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:02:57 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_2): Silence warnings on
> artificial decls.
Shouldn't this patch fix libgomp.c++/target-3.C in an offloading-enabled
configuration? It still fails...
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/../l
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > when compiling C++ program that define different number of virtual method
> > in different classes, we output warnings about their virtual tables
> > being of different type. THese warnings looks ugly and we are able
> > to diagnose the situa
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> when compiling C++ program that define different number of virtual method
> in different classes, we output warnings about their virtual tables
> being of different type. THese warnings looks ugly and we are able
> to diagnose the situation in more s
Hi,
when compiling C++ program that define different number of virtual method
in different classes, we output warnings about their virtual tables
being of different type. THese warnings looks ugly and we are able
to diagnose the situation in more sensible way.
This patch simply silences all warnin
10 matches
Mail list logo