On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 12-11-14 15:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > [ moved from gcc@ to gcc-patches@ ]
> > > [ subject was: Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support ]
> > > On 30-09-14 15:37, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > >
On 12-11-14 15:17, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
[ moved from gcc@ to gcc-patches@ ]
[ subject was: Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support ]
On 30-09-14 15:37, Tom de Vries wrote:
I would be happily accepting splitting the current autopar pass
that way,
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ moved from gcc@ to gcc-patches@ ]
> [ subject was: Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support ]
> On 30-09-14 15:37, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > I would be happily accepting splitting the current autopar pass
> > > that way, that is, do
> > >
> > > NE
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 14:16 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
I can't speak to the rest of the patch, but one readability nitpick:
> diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def
> index 2305d67..dd91718 100644
> --- a/gcc/passes.def
> +++ b/gcc/passes.def
> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ along with GCC; see the fi
[ moved from gcc@ to gcc-patches@ ]
[ subject was: Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support ]
On 30-09-14 15:37, Tom de Vries wrote:
I would be happily accepting splitting the current autopar pass
that way, that is, do
NEXT_PASS (pass_parallelize_loops)
PUSH_INSERT_PASSES_WITHIN (pass_paral
