Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-19 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Sandiford writes: > Gerald Pfeifer writes: >> On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> To rule out one possibility: which GCC are you using for stage1? >> >> I think that may the smoking gun. When I use GCC 4.7 to bootstrap, >> FreeBSD 8, 9 and 10 all build fine on i386 (= i486)

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-18 Thread Richard Sandiford
Gerald Pfeifer writes: > On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> To rule out one possibility: which GCC are you using for stage1? > > I think that may the smoking gun. When I use GCC 4.7 to bootstrap, > FreeBSD 8, 9 and 10 all build fine on i386 (= i486) and amd64. > > When I use the sys

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-18 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote: > To rule out one possibility: which GCC are you using for stage1? I think that may the smoking gun. When I use GCC 4.7 to bootstrap, FreeBSD 8, 9 and 10 all build fine on i386 (= i486) and amd64. When I use the system compiler, which is GCC 4.2 on F

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-17 Thread Richard Sandiford
Gerald Pfeifer writes: > On Sat, 10 May 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> Since (at least) 16:40 UTC that day my i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 builds >> fail as follows: >> >> Comparing stages 2 and 3 >> warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs >> warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs >> warning: gcc

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-16 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Since (at least) 16:40 UTC that day my i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 builds > fail as follows: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs > B

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-10 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote: > All done… It is in. Since (at least) 16:40 UTC that day my i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 builds fail as follows: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-07 Thread Richard Sandiford
Jan-Benedict Glaw writes: > On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >> On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: >> > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours >> > as we have a very large merge to do. >> > thanks. >> >> All done… It is in. > > Jus

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-07 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 7 May 2014 09:48, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Christophe Lyon writes: > >> It also looks like the git-svn-id property is now wrong/incomplete. >> For instance, commit 9a5942c1d4d9116ab74b0741cfe3894a89fd17fb has: >> git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/wide-int@201706 >> 138bc75d

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-07 Thread Andreas Schwab
Christophe Lyon writes: > It also looks like the git-svn-id property is now wrong/incomplete. > For instance, commit 9a5942c1d4d9116ab74b0741cfe3894a89fd17fb has: > git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/wide-int@201706 > 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 > > How does it map to

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-07 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we > > have a very large merge to do. > > thanks. > > All done… It is in. Just found one more: g++ -c -g -O2 -D

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-06 Thread Mike Stump
On May 6, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > >> My build robot experiences errors like this: >> >> g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions >> -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing >> -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribu

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-06 Thread Mike Stump
On May 6, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > > I’m pretty sure this: > will fix it. If someone can confirm that would be great. I tried that on my p7 and on my x86_64 machines, they both build fine.

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-06 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Tue, 2014-05-06 15:54:05 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On May 6, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > > > On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck > > > wrote: > > > > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple o

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-06 Thread Christophe Lyon
I have noticed build failures too (arm, aarch64). It also looks like the git-svn-id property is now wrong/incomplete. For instance, commit 9a5942c1d4d9116ab74b0741cfe3894a89fd17fb has: git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/wide-int@201706 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 How

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-06 Thread Mike Stump
On May 6, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >> On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: >>> please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we >>> have a very large merge to do. >>> thanks. >> >> All

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-06 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Tue, 2014-05-06 12:20:54 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we > > have a very large merge to do. > > thanks. > > All done… It is in. My build robot experiences errors like t

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

2014-05-06 Thread Mike Stump
On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we have > a very large merge to do. > thanks. All done… It is in.