On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>
> On May 14, 2012, at 15:14 , David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Yes, something like that test.
>>
>> Should the test go in g++.dg/eh or in g++.target/powerpc?
>
> It's really about the general capability to have unwinding get
> through signal hand
On May 14, 2012, at 15:14 , David Edelsohn wrote:
> Yes, something like that test.
>
> Should the test go in g++.dg/eh or in g++.target/powerpc?
It's really about the general capability to have unwinding get
through signal handlers. The same test (same sources) should work on
other targets th
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2012, at 00:03 , David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> I forgot to ask, is there a non-Ada, target-specific testcase that you
>> can add to ensure this functionality does not get broken?
>>
>> Thanks, David
>
> Something like that in cp/
On May 12, 2012, at 16:43 , David Edelsohn wrote:
> Please do not create another definition of the register number for LR.
Oh ...
> Earlier in the file it is defined as R_LR. Dropping in a completely
> self-contained chunk with its own naming is confusing. LR_REGNO is
> fine, but please define
On May 13, 2012, at 00:03 , David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> I forgot to ask, is there a non-Ada, target-specific testcase that you
> can add to ensure this functionality does not get broken?
>
> Thanks, David
Something like that in cp/eh ?
// { dg-do run { target { { *-*-aix5* } } } }
// { dg-option
> libgcc/
> * config/rs6000/aix-unwind.h (ucontext_for): Helper for ...
> (ppc_aix_fallback_frame_state): New, implementation of ...
> (MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR): Define.
I forgot to ask, is there a non-Ada, target-specific testcase that you
can add to ensure this functiona
libgcc/
* config/rs6000/aix-unwind.h (ucontext_for): Helper for ...
(ppc_aix_fallback_frame_state): New, implementation of ...
(MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR): Define.
Please do not create another definition of the register number for LR.
Earlier in the file it is defined as
