On May 12, 2012, at 16:43 , David Edelsohn wrote: > Please do not create another definition of the register number for LR.
Oh ... > Earlier in the file it is defined as R_LR. Dropping in a completely > self-contained chunk with its own naming is confusing. LR_REGNO is > fine, but please define the necessary registers at the beginning of > the file and use them consistently throughout. Sure. > Okay with that cleanup. Thanks for your prompt feedback :)
