Re: gcc 4.7 libgo patch committed: Set libgo version number

2012-10-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:57:21AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> The problem is that I forgot to do that when the 4.7 branch was >> created. So the 4.7 branch and the 4.6 branch were using the same >> SONAME although they had completely

Re: gcc 4.7 libgo patch committed: Set libgo version number

2012-10-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:57:21AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > The problem is that I forgot to do that when the 4.7 branch was > created. So the 4.7 branch and the 4.6 branch were using the same > SONAME although they had completely different ABIs. > > That is, there is no ABI change on the

Re: gcc 4.7 libgo patch committed: Set libgo version number

2012-10-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 06:16:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 23.10.2012 06:55, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> > PR 54918 points out that libgo is not using version numbers as it >> > should. At present none of libgo in 4.6, 4.7 and main

Re: gcc 4.7 libgo patch committed: Set libgo version number

2012-10-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 06:16:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.10.2012 06:55, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > PR 54918 points out that libgo is not using version numbers as it > > should. At present none of libgo in 4.6, 4.7 and mainline are > > compatible with each other. This patch to the

Re: gcc 4.7 libgo patch committed: Set libgo version number

2012-10-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 23.10.2012 06:55, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > PR 54918 points out that libgo is not using version numbers as it > should. At present none of libgo in 4.6, 4.7 and mainline are > compatible with each other. This patch to the 4.7 branch sets the > version number for libgo there. Bootstrapped and

Re: gcc 4.7 libgo patch committed: Set libgo version number

2012-10-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:55:01 +0200, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> PR 54918 points out that libgo is not using version numbers as it >> should. At present none of libgo in 4.6, 4.7 and mainline are >> compatible with each other. This patch

Re: gcc 4.7 libgo patch committed: Set libgo version number

2012-10-23 Thread Jan Kratochvil
Hello Ian, On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:55:01 +0200, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > PR 54918 points out that libgo is not using version numbers as it > should. At present none of libgo in 4.6, 4.7 and mainline are > compatible with each other. This patch to the 4.7 branch sets the > version number for libg