On 23.10.2012 06:55, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > PR 54918 points out that libgo is not using version numbers as it > should. At present none of libgo in 4.6, 4.7 and mainline are > compatible with each other. This patch to the 4.7 branch sets the > version number for libgo there. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to 4.7 branch.
changing the soname of a runtime library on the branch? I don't like this idea at all. Matthias
