Re: bb partitioning vs optimize_function_for_speed_p

2011-08-31 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/31/11 15:41, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 08/29/11 18:02, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 08/26/11 08:47, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >>> In rest_of_reorder_blocks, we avoid reordering if >>> !optimize_function_for_speed_p. However, we still call >>> insert_sectio

Re: bb partitioning vs optimize_function_for_speed_p

2011-08-31 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 08/29/11 18:02, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/26/11 08:47, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> In rest_of_reorder_blocks, we avoid reordering if >> !optimize_function_for_speed_p. However, we still call >> insert_section_bounary_note, which can cause problems because now, if >> we have a sequence of HOT-COLD-HO

Re: bb partitioning vs optimize_function_for_speed_p

2011-08-29 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/26/11 08:47, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > In rest_of_reorder_blocks, we avoid reordering if > !optimize_function_for_speed_p. However, we still call > insert_section_bounary_note, which can cause problems because now, if > we have a sequence of HOT-C