On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I don't have a recommendation to change or keep the current name,
> however I'll note that changing the name of a single file is going
> to be even simpler then the below which I just applied.
And this addresses three pages to avoid the redirect I just p
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > I think it would be appropriate to redirect all the c99status.html files
> > for particular GCC versions to this file, now it covers all versions.
>
> To make sure I understand: you are proposing we remove all
> individual c99status.html pages and
Hi Joseph,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I've committed this patch to rework the page so it starts with a summary
> of the overall C99 state, then describes each feature by listing the GCC
> version in which it was substantially supported (not necessarily obscure
> corner cases)
