Hi Joseph, On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I've committed this patch to rework the page so it starts with a summary > of the overall C99 state, then describes each feature by listing the GCC > version in which it was substantially supported (not necessarily obscure > corner cases), or "N/A" if no compiler support required, with further > notes then directly included in the table where reasonable. Hopefully > this will be less confusing to readers than the previous version.
thanks for working on this! > I think it would be appropriate to redirect all the c99status.html files > for particular GCC versions to this file, now it covers all versions. To make sure I understand: you are proposing we remove all individual c99status.html pages and have the web server redirect to the one you just updated for all of those? I'll be happy to make that change once you confirmed. Gerald