On Dec 4, 2013, at 10:12 PM, max wrote:
> Here is a patch with initial ThreadSanitizer testsuite. It basically adds
> several tests from upstream LLVM testsuite.
> It works fine on x86_64 with patch from
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188 applied.
> Ok to commit
Ok.
> should
>> Ok to commit?
> Sure, that was the "Ok, thanks." in the previous mail.
Commited in r205704.
-Y
> 2013-12-05 Max Ostapenko < m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com >
> 2013-12-05 Max Ostapenko actually.
Ok, I'm sorry, I'll fix it. Ok to commit?
-Maxim
2013-12-05 Max Ostapenko
* c-c++-common/tsan/atomic_stack.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/tsan/fd_pipe_race.c: New test.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:51:44PM +0400, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> >2013-12-05 Max Ostapenko
> >2013-12-05 Max Ostapenko actually.
>
> Ok, I'm sorry, I'll fix it. Ok to commit?
Sure, that was the "Ok, thanks." in the previous mail.
Jakub
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:19:35PM +0400, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> > Instead of mentioning the directory in the ChangeLog,
> > mention the individual test files.
> > ...
> >* g++.dg/dg.exp: Prune tsan subdirectory.
>
> Thanks, I fixed the ChangeLog file.
>
> > how long does it take to run mak
> Instead of mentioning the directory in the ChangeLog,
> mention the individual test files.
> ...
>* g++.dg/dg.exp: Prune tsan subdirectory.
Thanks, I fixed the ChangeLog file.
> how long does it take to run make check-gcc check-g++
RUNTESTFLAGS=tsan.exp ?
> How much memory does it need?
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:30:21PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> my 2c: running all upstream tsan tests (ninja check-tsan) takes 10
> seconds on my (beefy) machine and requires rather little memory.
> Of course, you need lots of *virtual* memory.
*virtual* memory is acceptable, not very ni
my 2c: running all upstream tsan tests (ninja check-tsan) takes 10
seconds on my (beefy) machine and requires rather little memory.
Of course, you need lots of *virtual* memory.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:12:36AM +0400, max wrote:
>> Hello,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:12:36AM +0400, max wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch with initial ThreadSanitizer testsuite. It basically
> adds several tests from upstream LLVM testsuite.
> It works fine on x86_64 with patch from
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188 applied.
>
> Ok t
