On 10/21/11 20:38, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/21/11 15:42, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 10/14/11 17:35, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>>> The scheduler part of the patch is ok for me (other part changes are
>>> obvious). Could you only commit it at the beginning of the next week.
>>
>> I've committed th
On 10/21/11 15:42, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/14/11 17:35, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> The scheduler part of the patch is ok for me (other part changes are
>> obvious). Could you only commit it at the beginning of the next week.
>
> I've committed this variant. It's updated for some recent chang
On 10/14/11 17:35, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 05:01 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg02053.html
>>
>>
> It is hard to read the patch without function names.
Oh, you mean without -p? Not sure how that happened, svn diff seems to
add them when run
On 10/13/2011 05:01 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/30/11 17:29, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This patch allows a backend to set a new scheduler flag, DO_PREDICATION,
which will make the haifa scheduler try to move insns across jumps by
predicating them. On C6X, the primary benefit is to fill jump delay
On 09/30/11 17:29, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> This patch allows a backend to set a new scheduler flag, DO_PREDICATION,
> which will make the haifa scheduler try to move insns across jumps by
> predicating them. On C6X, the primary benefit is to fill jump delay slots.
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
