On 10/14/11 17:35, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > On 10/13/2011 05:01 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg02053.html >> >> > It is hard to read the patch without function names.
Oh, you mean without -p? Not sure how that happened, svn diff seems to add them when run on my machine. I may have run it on gcc60 during ia64 testing. > As I understand, changes for tree/sra.c is in the patch by accident. Yes - it was necessary to get ia64 to bootstrap. > Thanks for additional scheduler code cleaning. > > The scheduler part of the patch is ok for me (other part changes are > obvious). Could you only commit it at the beginning of the next week. Thank you! Bernd
