On 27 August 2012 18:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Unless anyone has objections I'm going to commit this to trunk,
> implementing Sebastian's idea to disable the verbose terminate handler
> and the "pure virtual function called" message, which write to stderr
> when a process terminates. This allows
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Mike Stump wrote:
> So, I was thinking about this a little... Native compilers usually want
> the pretty verbose stuff and can usually pay the price. Cross compilers
> as a class, are less able to pay the price. Maybe we want to default
> based merely on target != host?
On 28 August 2012 18:29, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Unless anyone has objections I'm going to commit this to trunk,
>
>> implementing Sebastian's idea to disable the verbose terminate handler
>> and the "pure virtual function called" message, which w
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Unless anyone has objections I'm going to commit this to trunk,
> implementing Sebastian's idea to disable the verbose terminate handler
> and the "pure virtual function called" message, which write to stderr
> when a process terminates. This
