On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Mike Stump wrote: > So, I was thinking about this a little... Native compilers usually want > the pretty verbose stuff and can usually pay the price. Cross compilers > as a class, are less able to pay the price. Maybe we want to default > based merely on target != host? I know in my cross compiler, I think
Certainly not. The configuration of the compiler for any given target should not depend on the host, and existing instances of such things are bugs. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
