On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:29 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
> > On 15 May 2019, at 19:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:48 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There is at least one assembler that supports ‘setssbsy' but not “endbr*”.
> >> We can catch this by adding "
> On 15 May 2019, at 19:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:48 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is at least one assembler that supports ‘setssbsy' but not “endbr*”.
>> We can catch this by adding "-fcf-protection” to the
>> check_effective_target_cet test.
>
> H
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:48 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is at least one assembler that supports ‘setssbsy' but not “endbr*”.
> We can catch this by adding "-fcf-protection” to the
> check_effective_target_cet test.
How about adding asm ("endbr") to the source?
Uros.
> OK for trunk
