> On 15 May 2019, at 19:02, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:48 PM Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is at least one assembler that supports ‘setssbsy' but not “endbr*”.
>> We can catch this by adding "-fcf-protection” to the
>> check_effective_target_cet test.
>
> How about adding asm ("endbr") to the source?
it would have to be ‘endbr32’ or ‘endbr64’ I suppose.. I guess
#if __LP64__
asm (“endbr64”);
#else
asm (“endbr32”):
#endif
would work?
AFAICT that’s effectively what adding -fcf-protection does.
I’m happy with either.
Iain
