On 05/12/2015 03:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
> gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
> just the major number. Then I only need the following small
> patch (where I don't speak enough tcl for fixing li
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
> >>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
> >> wrote:
> >>> On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu"
> >>wrote:
> On Tue,
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu"
>>wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>
On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu"
>wrote:
>>>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>> So we have
>>
>> experimental
>> release
>> p
On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>> >> So we have
>>> >>
>>> >> experimental
>>> >> release
>>> >> post-release
>>> >>
>>> >> Why not just rename prerelease to post-rel
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> >> So we have
>> >>
>> >> experimental
>> >> release
>> >> post-release
>> >>
>> >> Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is a one-line
>> >> change.
>> >
>> > Why print anything
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> So we have
> >>
> >> experimental
> >> release
> >> post-release
> >>
> >> Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is a one-line
> >> change.
> >
> > Why print anything at all? 5.1.1 is after 5.1.0 in obvious ways.
> >
>
> How can you te
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I promised to send o
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
> >> > gcc/FULL-VER
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >
>> > I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
>> > gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
> > gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
> > just the major number. Then I only need the following sma
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
> gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
> just the major number. Then I only need the following small
> patch (where I don't speak enough tcl for
13 matches
Mail list logo
