On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> >>>> >> So we have >>>> >> >>>> >> experimental >>>> >> release >>>> >> post-release >>>> >> >>>> >> Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is a >>one-line >>>> >> change. >>>> > >>>> > Why print anything at all? 5.1.1 is after 5.1.0 in obvious ways. >>>> > >>>> >>>> How can you tell GCC 5.1.1 on May 1, 2015 from GCC 5.1.1 >>>> on May 12, 2015? >>> >>> Via the svn revision. But as the subject says, this patch is not so >>much >> >>So? Doesn't post-release display the svn revision.for gcc -v, which >>gcc -v doesn't display today? Something like this >> >>diff --git a/gcc/DEV-PHASE b/gcc/DEV-PHASE >>index e69de29..ee176f8 100644 >>--- a/gcc/DEV-PHASE >>+++ b/gcc/DEV-PHASE >>@@ -0,0 +1 @@ >>+post-release > > Printing post-release doesn't add any information. I believe Jakub fixed the > missing svn revision printing already. >
What is the real benefit of your patch? -- H.J.
