Sorry, forgot to attach diff.
-Original Message-
From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 7:04 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [MAINTAINERS] Update my email address
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Pushing to trunk.
Signed-off-by: Prath
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:53 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 2:32 PM Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 02:23:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 06:04:09AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 2:32 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 02:23:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 06:04:09AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:48:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > > I
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 02:23:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 06:04:09AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:48:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > I started to hunt
> > > down all the Makefile which add a -Werror but th
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:22:45AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 06:04:09 -0500
> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:48:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > No. You should patch your program, instead. One easy way is to add a
> > -Wn
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 06:04:09AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:48:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I started to hunt
> > down all the Makefile which add a -Werror but there are a lot and
> > eventually I got bored and gave up.
>
> I have a patc
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 06:04:09 -0500
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:48:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I started to hunt
> > down all the Makefile which add a -Werror but there are a lot and
> > eventually I got bored and gave up.
>
> I have a patch st
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:48:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I started to hunt
> down all the Makefile which add a -Werror but there are a lot and
> eventually I got bored and gave up.
I have a patch stack for that, since 2014 or so. I build Linux with
unreleased GCC versions
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 09:53:27PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:54:38 +1000
> Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> > And let's not forget: removing a filesystem from the kernel is not
> > removing end user support for extracting data from old filesystems.
> > We have VMs for that - we
Oops! Sorry about that, should be fixed now!
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:32 PM Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
> Matthew Beliveau writes:
>
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2019-06-11 Matthew Beliveau
>
>
> I don't believe this ;-)
>
> > * MAINTAINERS: Add m
Matthew Beliveau writes:
> ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-06-11 Matthew Beliveau
I don't believe this ;-)
> * MAINTAINERS: Add myself.
>
> --- MAINTAINERS (revision 272167)
> +++ MAINTAINERS (working copy)
> @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@
> Gergö Barany
>
Hi.
Thanks for the script, it also found me in Write After Approval section.
Thus I'll install following patch.
Tom what about installing the script into contrib?
Martin
>From ae02963208cf24d7b0df133507a89f776b3c4599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:24:17 +0200
Su
On 03/21/2018 08:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I just had reason to look at the target maintainer list. There seems to be
a couple of CPU ports listed in MAINTAINERS that do not exist in the config
directory.
Ok to remove? (Jeff you're t
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I just had reason to look at the target maintainer list. There seems to be
> a couple of CPU ports listed in MAINTAINERS that do not exist in the config
> directory.
>
> Ok to remove? (Jeff you're the lucky, 'who do I ask' recipient)
Ple
On 06/11/2017 08:03 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2017, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 05/30/2017 09:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> This leaves the nvptx and c6x ports without a maintainer. Do
>>> you have any recommendations for a successor here?
>> Not really. It would be a shame to
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 09:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> This leaves the nvptx and c6x ports without a maintainer. Do
>> you have any recommendations for a successor here?
> Not really. It would be a shame to lose the C6X port though. If I'm
> CC'd on any bug
On 05/30/2017 09:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> This leaves the nvptx and c6x ports without a maintainer. Do you have
> any recommendations for a successor here?
Not really. It would be a shame to lose the C6X port though. If I'm CC'd
on any bug reports I'm prepared to keep it working - if that's
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 05/27/2017 12:52 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> I am no longer working for Red Hat, so I've updated my email address.
>> Also, I don't expect to be around very much in the near future, so I've
>> removed myself as maintainer for some areas
On 05/27/2017 12:52 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I am no longer working for Red Hat, so I've updated my email address.
Also, I don't expect to be around very much in the near future, so I've
removed myself as maintainer for some areas.
Judging by a reply I got, I may have been too terse. No need to
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Update my email address
Did you mean to step down as
-type-safe vectors Nathan Sidwell
maintainer?
Unlike the other entries you modified, there is no + line with
your new address.
Gerald
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 12:10 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Carl,
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:11:11AM -0700, Carl E. Love wrote:
> > Manuel López-Ibáñez
> > Martin v. Löwis
> > H.J. Lu
> > +Carl Love
> > Christophe Lyon
>
Hi,
I added myself to the MAINTAINERS file (Write After Approval) on
10/27/2016. The commit was r241636.
Sorry, forgot the patch the first time.
Carl Love
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 241636)
+++ Cha
> Sorry, my bad. I should have updated given the length of time between
> when the patch was submitted and approved and installed.
>
> Thanks for taking care of it. I assume you've got no interest in
> maintaining hpux or ia64 anymore? :-)
>
> jeff
What's hpux and ia64? :-)
Steve Ellcey
On 10/05/2016 12:55 PM, Ellcey, Steve wrote:
Jeff,
FYI: I noticed that your MAINTAINERS update reverted my address from
sell...@caviumnetworks.com back to sell...@imgtec.com.
I went ahead and fixed it.
Steve Ellcey
sell...@caviumnetworks.com
2016-10-05 Steve Ellcey
* MAINTAINERS:
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
Spurred by the lack of response to Sandra's message WRT a cygwin/mingw
issue, I did a quick pass through the MAINTAINERS file for folks that
are listed as maintainers, but aren't (to the best of my knowledge)
acting in those positions anymore.
I removed th
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Janis Johnson wrote:
> I retired from Mentor Graphics 3 weeks ago and have no immediate plans
> to be active in GCC, so I'm resigning as a testsuite maintainer. I'm
> leaving myself under Write After Approval with my personal email address
> so people can find me.
Thanks for y
On 02/02/15 09:54, Janis Johnson wrote:
I retired from Mentor Graphics 3 weeks ago and have no immediate plans
to be active in GCC, so I'm resigning as a testsuite maintainer. I'm
leaving myself under Write After Approval with my personal email address
so people can find me.
Sounds good. Thank
On 12-02-03 09:33 , Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
Hi all,
I have inserted my name at correct order in the MAINTAINERS list.
Ok to commit ? please see the patch below.
Yes. These obviously correct changes do not need further approval.
Simply post the patch to the list and commit it.
Diego.
Hi Patrick,
Thank you for pointing that. I will fix it.
Regards,
Venkat.
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Marlier [mailto:patrick.marl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:20 PM
> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subjec
On 02/03/2012 11:44 AM, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
Index: MAINTAINERS
===
--- MAINTAINERS (revision 183872)
+++ MAINTAINERS (working copy)
@@ -538,6 +538,7 @@
Jon zieglerj...@apple.com
Roman zippelzip...@linux-m68k.org
Josef
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Nathan Froyd wrote:
(Setting maintainer point-of-contact to @gcc.gnu.org)
Please, anyone setting their contact adress to point at
gcc.gnu.org, test that it works to send email from somewhere
else than gcc.gnu.org, from an adress with a domain setting SPF
records. No MX betwee
31 matches
Mail list logo
