On 05/30/2017 09:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > This leaves the nvptx and c6x ports without a maintainer. Do you have > any recommendations for a successor here?
Not really. It would be a shame to lose the C6X port though. If I'm CC'd on any bug reports I'm prepared to keep it working - if that's considered sufficient, I can readd myself as maintainer. It hasn't required much attention over the years anyway. Bernd
