Re: C6X port 11/11: Testcases

2011-07-15 Thread Mike Stump
On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Committed this version. No one commented about the changes outside > gcc.target/tic6x, but I think they are reasonably obvious. I'm open to > suggestions for other names for the check_effective_target functions. They look fine. For gcc.dg/tortur

Re: C6X port 11/11: Testcases

2011-07-15 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 07/15/11 14:06, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Bernd Schmidt > wrote: >> On 05/10/11 17:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >>> This contains the testsuite changes for the C6X port. >> >> Committed this version. No one commented about the changes outside >> gcc.target/tic6x, but I thin

Re: C6X port 11/11: Testcases

2011-07-15 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 05/10/11 17:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> This contains the testsuite changes for the C6X port. > > Committed this version. No one commented about the changes outside > gcc.target/tic6x, but I think they are reasonably obvious. I'm open to >

Re: C6X port 11/11: Testcases

2011-07-15 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 05/10/11 17:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > This contains the testsuite changes for the C6X port. Committed this version. No one commented about the changes outside gcc.target/tic6x, but I think they are reasonably obvious. I'm open to suggestions for other names for the check_effective_target funct