On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Committed this version. No one commented about the changes outside > gcc.target/tic6x, but I think they are reasonably obvious. I'm open to > suggestions for other names for the check_effective_target functions.
They look fine. For gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-7.c, I'd prefer a 1 line comment on why skipping it. Something short and sweet, "no denorms" or some such. This lets people that fall into the same conceptual category as you quickly discover that and also skip.
