On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:57 AM Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 04:01:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_NAME))
> > > > > {
> > > > > identifier = cp_parser_identifier (parser);
> > > > > @@ -18904,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 04:01:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_NAME))
> > > > {
> > > > identifier = cp_parser_identifier (parser);
> > > > @@ -18904,7 +18916,12 @@ cp_parser_namespace_definition (cp_parser*
> > > >
On 11/23/18 4:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
I wasn't aware you had worked on this. Perhaps we should track the progress of
C++20 features in Bugzilla (to keep track of who's working on what).
Yes, I think so. I created a couple of PRs, for contracts and cmpxchg
with padding bits, but more are
On 11/21/18 8:46 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:59:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/19/18 5:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:33:17PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
2018-11-19 Marek Po
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 23:12, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > >A nested namespace definition cannot be inline. This is supposed to handle
> > >cases such as
> > >namespace A::B::inline C { ... }
> > >because after 'C' we don't see :: so it breaks and we call push_namespace
> > >outside the for loop. So
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:04:26AM +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:59:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 11/19/18 5:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> > + /* Don't forget that the innermost namespace might have been
> >> > + marked as inline. */
> >> > + is_in
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:59:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/19/18 5:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > + /* Don't forget that the innermost namespace might have been
>> > + marked as inline. */
>> > + is_inline |= nested_inline_p;
>> This looks wrong: an inline namespace does not ma
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:59:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/19/18 5:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:33:17PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > 2018-11-19 Marek Polacek
> > > >
> > > >
On 11/19/18 5:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:33:17PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
2018-11-19 Marek Polacek
Implement P1094R2, Nested inline namespaces.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/nested-inline-ns1.C: N
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:36:32AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:25:01AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
> >
> > Just another small comment - given the usual high number of
> > C++ regressions delaying the release
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:25:01AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> Just another small comment - given the usual high number of
> C++ regressions delaying the release is Stage3 the right time
> to add new language features?
I'd say this is
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:12 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:33:17PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > 2018-11-19 Marek Polacek
> > >
> > > Implement P1094R2, Nested inline namespaces.
> > > * g++
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:33:17PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > 2018-11-19 Marek Polacek
> >
> > Implement P1094R2, Nested inline namespaces.
> > * g++.dg/cpp2a/nested-inline-ns1.C: New test.
> > * g++.dg/cpp2a/nest
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> 2018-11-19 Marek Polacek
>
> Implement P1094R2, Nested inline namespaces.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/nested-inline-ns1.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/nested-inline-ns2.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/nested-inline-ns3.C
14 matches
Mail list logo
