Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-10-06 Thread Oleg Endo
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 17:57 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > have you considered also documenting the new __builtin_thread_pointer > and __builtin_set_thread_pointer built-ins? (I just noticed this by > chance.) Yes, sure. The documentation and www changes updates will follow soon.

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-10-06 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Oleg, have you considered also documenting the new __builtin_thread_pointer and __builtin_set_thread_pointer built-ins? (I just noticed this by chance.) On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > The atomic options of SH have been changed recently. The attached patch > updates the 4.8 changes.h

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-10-05 Thread Oleg Endo
After commiting the last SH changes updates for 4.8 I was kindly informed that the br tags were left open. I've committed the attached fix as obvious. Cheers, Oleg ? www_4_8_sh_changes_2_close_br.patch Index: htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-10-05 Thread Kaz Kojima
Oleg Endo wrote: > The atomic options of SH have been changed recently. The attached patch > updates the 4.8 changes.html accordingly, plus some minor wording fixes. > > OK? OK. Regards, kaz

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-09-02 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > The new SH option -menable-tas has been renamed to -mtas in rev 190782. > I have committed the attached patch to reflect this in the changes.html > for 4.8. Thanks for thinking of this. In line with changes Sandra made recently, I replaced future tense as f

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-08-20 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Oleg Endo wrote: > On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 21:43 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: >> > Thanks. Let's hope that I can squeeze in some more stuff while >> > stage 1 lasts. :T >> >> You know that for backend-specific changes (especi

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-08-20 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > You mean, since SH is neither a primary nor a secondary platform, > there are no particular release criteria for it? What does that > actually mean? >From what I recall, you can make stage 1 type changes even after stage 1. However, if your port is broken,

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-08-19 Thread Oleg Endo
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 21:43 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > > Thanks. Let's hope that I can squeeze in some more stuff while > > stage 1 lasts. :T > > You know that for backend-specific changes (especially for "smaller" > ports) you actually have some more l

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-08-19 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > Thanks. Let's hope that I can squeeze in some more stuff while > stage 1 lasts. :T You know that for backend-specific changes (especially for "smaller" ports) you actually have some more leeway? > But now that you mention it, maybe it would be better to re

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-08-19 Thread Oleg Endo
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 19:20 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > > This is what has been done so far on the SH side for 4.8. > > I hope it's OK. > > Wow, that is quite impressive (and a nice write-up also)! Thanks. Let's hope that I can squeeze in some more stuf

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-08-19 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote: > This is what has been done so far on the SH side for 4.8. > I hope it's OK. Wow, that is quite impressive (and a nice write-up also)! I see this was already approved, but allow me to suggest some minor editorial comments... Index: htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.ht

Re: [wwwdocs] SH 4.8 changes update

2012-08-18 Thread Kaz Kojima
Oleg Endo wrote: > This is what has been done so far on the SH side for 4.8. > I hope it's OK. Looks fine to me. Regards, kaz