On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Oleg Endo wrote:
> You mean, since SH is neither a primary nor a secondary platform,
> there are no particular release criteria for it? What does that
> actually mean?
>From what I recall, you can make stage 1 type changes even after
stage 1. However, if your port is broken, the release managers
will shrug their shoulders and release even if your port is quite
broken due to that.
Related to your web page update, I just comitted the patch below
which allows for direct linking to the SH entry.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -3 -p -r1.16 changes.html
--- changes.html 20 Aug 2012 11:02:28 -0000 1.16
+++ changes.html 20 Aug 2012 12:22:52 -0000
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ by this change.</p>
options to the assembler.</li>
</ul>
-<h3>SH</h3>
+<h3 id="sh">SH</h3>
<ul>
<li>The default alignment settings have been reduced to be less aggressive.
This results in more compact code for optimization levels other than
