On 12/14/2017 03:18 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Jakub,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 12/14/2017 02:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:40:12PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/
Hi Jakub,
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 12/14/2017 02:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:40:12PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
>> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
>> > > @@
Hi Tom,
> this patch introduces an effective target weak_undefined, and uses it in
> test-case visibility-22.c.
>
> I've tested this on trunk for x86_64, and the test still runs and passes.
>
> I've tested this on an internal branch for the gcn target, where it makes
> the test unsupported (instea
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 02:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:40:12PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >
On 12/14/2017 02:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:40:12PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
/* PR target/32219 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-require-visibility "" } */
+/*
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:40:12PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-22.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> /* PR target/32219 */
> /* { dg-do run } */
> /* { dg-require-visibility "" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target weak_un
