> Sorry, I missed your mail and it seems that my original mail did not
> hit the mailing list. I am attaching what I wrote back then for a record.
> The patch fixes situation where function is externaly visible and called
> once. In this case it makes sense to partially inline it into the
> one c
> Hi,
>
> see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-09/msg00028.html for the context.
> The patch sets DECL_NO_INLINE_WARNING_P on the non-inlinable part after
> splitting (an alternative would be to clear DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P).
Sorry, I missed your mail and it seems that my original mail did not
hit
