> Sorry, I missed your mail and it seems that my original mail did not > hit the mailing list. I am attaching what I wrote back then for a record. > The patch fixes situation where function is externaly visible and called > once. In this case it makes sense to partially inline it into the > one caller. Previous heuristic was wrong assuming that the function is > static and thus preventing splitting because it makes more sense to inline > it always.
OK, thanks for the explanation. > Thinking about it, we ought to prvent splitting always_inline functions: > those may contain something that relies on inlining. Either you can > include in your change or I will fix it as a followup. I'll let you make the change. -- Eric Botcazou
