2012/6/25 Richard Guenther :
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> > On 06/21/2012 12:48 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> >> 2012-06-18 Tristan Gingold
>> >>
>> >> * config/i386/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_end_prologue): Move c
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 06/21/2012 12:48 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >> 2012-06-18 Tristan Gingold
> >>
> >>* config/i386/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_end_prologue): Move code to ...
> >>(seh_cfa_adjust_c
On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 12:48 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> 2012-06-18 Tristan Gingold
>>
>> * config/i386/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_end_prologue): Move code to ...
>> (seh_cfa_adjust_cfa): ... that function.
>> (seh_emit_stackalloc): Do
On 06/21/2012 12:48 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> 2012-06-18 Tristan Gingold
>
> * config/i386/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_end_prologue): Move code to ...
> (seh_cfa_adjust_cfa): ... that function.
> (seh_emit_stackalloc): Do not emit out of range values.
> * config/i386/i386.md
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-06-21 00:48, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> @@ -9142,9 +9152,12 @@ ix86_compute_frame_layout (struct ix86_frame *frame)
>> {
>> HOST_WIDE_INT diff;
>>
>> - /* If we can leave the frame pointer where it is, do so. */
>> +
On 2012-06-21 00:48, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> @@ -9142,9 +9152,12 @@ ix86_compute_frame_layout (struct ix86_frame *frame)
> {
>HOST_WIDE_INT diff;
>
> - /* If we can leave the frame pointer where it is, do so. */
> + /* If we can leave the frame pointer where it is, do so.
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Václav Zeman wrote:
> On 21 June 2012 09:48, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Here is the new version. It is now possible to use __builtin_frame_address
>> (0) to get the current establisher frame thanks to a tiny adjustment.
>>
>> No regressions on x86_64-linux, and an x
On 21 June 2012 09:48, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Here is the new version. It is now possible to use __builtin_frame_address
> (0) to get the current establisher frame thanks to a tiny adjustment.
>
> No regressions on x86_64-linux, and an x86_64-windows native gdb can be built
> and run.
>
> Tris
