2012/6/25 Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de>: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: > >> >> On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> >> > On 06/21/2012 12:48 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote: >> >> 2012-06-18 Tristan Gingold <ging...@adacore.com> >> >> >> >> * config/i386/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_end_prologue): Move code to ... >> >> (seh_cfa_adjust_cfa): ... that function. >> >> (seh_emit_stackalloc): Do not emit out of range values. >> >> * config/i386/i386.md: Delete unused UNSPEC_REG_SAVE, >> >> UNSPEC_DEF_CFA constants. >> >> * config/i386/i386.h (SEH_MAX_FRAME_SIZE): Define. >> >> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_frame_pointer_required): Required >> >> for very large frames on SEH target. >> >> (ix86_compute_frame_layout): Save area is before frame pointer >> >> on SEH target. Handle very large frames. >> >> (ix86_expand_prologue): Likewise. >> > >> > Ok. >> >> I propose to backport it to the gcc 4.7 branch, as it fixes two issues: >> incorrect unwind info emitted and support of setjmp. >> Is it Ok ? > > Target maintainers call - but please give it some more time on trunk to > allow regressions to be reported. > > Richard.
Please give current version this week for testing. If no regressions about it are found a backport to 4.7 branch is ok for me. Thanks, Kai
