On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 08/18/2011 10:30 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Ok.
> Great. Thus I'm going ahead and committing the patch to fix the regression.
> > It looks like we might want to elimiate abs_hwi alltogether in favor of
> > absu_hwi?
> Indeed, you are totally rig
On 08/18/2011 10:30 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Ok.
Great. Thus I'm going ahead and committing the patch to fix the regression.
It looks like we might want to elimiate abs_hwi alltogether in favor
of absu_hwi?
Indeed, you are totally right. But I'd rather work on that as a followup
patch (may
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared the below basing on an hint provided by Joseph on the audit trail:
> essentially, I'm replacing all (but two) uses of abs_hwi outside hwint.c by
> absu_hwi, a variant which returns an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. All the
> replacements mak
Paolo Carlini wrote:
I sanity checked the patch on x86_64-linux and OP reported that on AVR
the patch fixes the regression.
Not really "on" AVR; AVR are just tiny 8-bit microcontrollers ;-)
I obseved the problem when compiling for AVR on a x86-linux-gnu host
where 0x8000 is negative.
J
