On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Paolo Carlini wrote: > On 08/18/2011 10:30 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > Ok. > Great. Thus I'm going ahead and committing the patch to fix the regression. > > It looks like we might want to elimiate abs_hwi alltogether in favor of > > absu_hwi? > Indeed, you are totally right. But I'd rather work on that as a followup patch > (maybe with Sebastian' help?) because it doesn't seem completely trivial: I'm > mostly worried by the existing uses of abs_hwi *inside* hwint.c itself not but > those two remaining instances outside of it (which would be possible to > replace immediately).
Sure as a followup. Richard.
