Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> This causes several failures with -m32 (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2014-05/msg3.html):
Sorry for the breakage - obviously, I forgot to test with -m32.
> Most of the failures are fixed by replacing 'kind=8' with 'kind=.' or
> 'kind=\[48\]'.
Either
This causes several failures with -m32 (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2014-05/msg3.html):
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_this_image_1.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times
original "bar \\(real\\(kind=4\\)\\[2\\] \\* restrict x, void \\* restrict
caf_token.., integer\\(kind=8\\) caf_offse
> > * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-04/msg00091.html
>
> "dg2final" Surely this is a typo? ...
I also see dg1final and dg.final.
Dominique
Dear Tobias,
On 27 April 2014 20:56, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> First, I would be really delighted if someone could review my coarray
> patches for the trunk as it makes simpler to develop patches on top of it:
> * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-04/msg00087.html
This is OK for trunk.
> * http:/
