Dear Tobias, On 27 April 2014 20:56, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: > First, I would be really delighted if someone could review my coarray > patches for the trunk as it makes simpler to develop patches on top of it: > * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-04/msg00087.html
This is OK for trunk. > * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-04/msg00091.html "dg2final" ???? Surely this is a typo? Although I note that getting it wrong on a German keyboard should produce a 4. Therefore it might well be a command that i do not know about. Otherwise, OK for trunk. > * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-04/msg00092.html > This is OK for trunk > Secondly, attached is a patch which fixes an ICE - and prepares for some > additional class-related coarray patches. In particular, the patch ensures > that for nonallocatable *polymorphic* coarrays, the coarray token and offset > are passed. This is also OK for trunk. > > Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux. > OK for the trunk? > > Tobias > > PS: There is still something wrong (for both -fcoarray=single and > -fcoarray=lib) with lcobound/ucobounds and polymorphic coarrays and with > using them with select type and associated. That's something I would like to > tackle next. If that's done, I probably should really concentrate on > reviewing a few patches and doing some other bug fixes before continue > working on coarrays. Thank you truly for the effort that you are putting into co-arrays. It is highly gratifying that gfortran seems to perform so well compared with another product. Frankly, if I were you I would continue working on co-arrays, whilst you have the wind in your sails :-) Best regards Paul -- The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. --Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
