Thanks for the report, HJ. And thanks for finding the problem Dominique
before I could even look at the PR. (I have no idea how the typo ended
up in my local patch file - it was clearly not present when I regtested
the patch.)
I have committed the attached patch as obvious - after regtesting.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> This patch fixes the result check for coarrays / variables with coarray
> subcomponents. It was working with a separate RESULT() variable - but not if
> the function name was the result variable.
>
> Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
> OK f
On Thursday 04 August 2011 17:00:46 Tobias Burnus wrote:
> This patch fixes the result check for coarrays / variables with coarray
> subcomponents. It was working with a separate RESULT() variable - but
> not if the function name was the result variable.
>
> Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
>